HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
CONSULTATIONS ON FUTURE OF SALFORD ‘DIDN’T MAKE SENSE’ ADMITS GMCA
 

Star date: 20th February 2017

MASSIVE GREEN BELT AND HOUSING PLANS 'DIDN'T MAKE SENSE TO ORDINARY PEOPLE'

Consultations on the future of Salford and every other area of Greater Manchester were "bewildering" and didn't "make sense to ordinary people" the Greater Manchester Combined Authority (GMCA) has admitted in a report to be discussed this week.

These consultations on devolution and the GM Spatial Framework were to decide on things like Green Belt destruction, how many houses were to be built and lots more. They were absolutely crucial to the future of the area, and for the GMCA to admit they didn't make sense is staggering, if true.

Full details here...


A report by the Greater Manchester Combined Authority's (GMCA) Joint Scrutiny Pool on communications states that its consultations on devolution and the GM Spatial Framework "were bewildering, particularly for non-local government professionals" and that "an unintended consequence of embarking on a consultation that doesn't make sense to ordinary people can actually lead to
disengagement and cynicism
"...

The consultations weren't just about peripheral issues but about the whole future of Salford and every other area in Greater Manchester. When the draft Spatial Framework was launched last year, the Salford Star wrote that "Once rubber stamped by Salford City Council and all the other nine GM local councils, it will render all planning decisions in the city redundant when it comes to the principal of development.

"Salford will basically lose whatever sovereignty it has over such matters" the Star added "with all power in the hands of the GM Mayor, aided by his Cabinet of the ten local council leaders." That is how important this particular consultation was (see here).

When the GM Spatial Framework (itself a turn-off title) was finally published in full, those who managed to understand it campaigned against its recommendations, which included massive destruction of Salford's Green Belt plus the plonking of 15% of all future Greater Manchester housing in the city.

The document was so complicated that even Salford Labour councillors were issued with an idiot sheet to help them soothe furious residents (see here).

During the whole process of the consultations on both devolution powers and the GM Spatial Framework, the GMCA refused to respond to Salford Star requests for interviews and comments (see here). One of the devolution consultations garnered just 169 responses from almost three million people!*

Now the communications report, which included feedback from 'external stakeholders', including for some reason, Greater London Authority, has slammed GMCA's communications, even noting that there seems to be nobody with "overall responsibility for communications". It also notes that communication "has proved to be inconsistent, disjointed and reactive"...

..."GM messages often do not resonate with people" the report adds "they are perceived to be complicated and confusing with language used often not being suitably accessible."

The report also notes that "The upcoming election campaign of GM's first elected Mayor will give a huge opportunity to engage the public. It is vital that the key messages outlining GM's vision, and the strategy that underpin it, are effectively communicated to enable elected members, residents and the staff of public sector organisations understand the GMCA's work and its relevance to their lives."

At the 'Joint Meeting of the GMCA and AGMA Executive Board Meeting' this week there are a number of recommendations to improve communications, including to "refresh the GMCA's strategic communications plan" and, incredibly, to "Develop a 'Greater Manchester elects' website with full facts in plain English describing what the Mayor of GM and GMCA/AGMA each can do (as soon as possible)"....

The report recommends that GMCA should "Provide briefings on the main policy areas of the GMCA's work including local examples to 'bring this work to life' to elected members, staff, residents and media outlets" by "March 2017". The GM Mayor election is in May.

The report is an admittance of the stunning communications failure of the GMCA that has been pointed out over and over again by both the media and even the House of Commons Select Committee (see here).

Unfortunately, the 'bewildering' consultations that 'didn't make sense' are already closed and over the coming months the plans will be implemented, with 'ordinary people' probably none the wiser...until their Green Belt disappears or a giant housing estate of unaffordable properties appears on their doorstep.


• Salford City Council hasn't exactly helped its residents engage with the 'GM Spatial Framework', endorsing it at every opportunity and, confusingly producing its own `Framework' almost at the same time (see here).

*See previous Salford Star article - GMCA Consults on Further Powers - click here and click here

* On 1st April there is a planned March on Manchester by groups opposed to the destruction of Green Belt

Get them built wrote
at 12:52:32 on 23 February 2017
It's a shame that people feel they have been kept in the dark and misled as those who have been genuinely interested in the future of Greater Manchester have been fully aware of the processes being followed for months if not years. Complaining you didn't know purely because until recently you didn't care is a poor basis for complaining. There is masses of paperwork because this is a massive undertaking by the GMCA. It was never going to be a quick or easy read and to suggest that providing councillors with a summary is wrong is also wrong...why would you not give them the additional info to answer questions as far as possible. The objectors are spinning the situation to look like victims at every opportunity.
?
Michael James Felse wrote
at 12:51:53 on 23 February 2017
Thanks PaulS you trigger a lot to think about. The Integrated Assessment (331 pages) and other huge supporting documentation is I fear to confuse those living in Salford who may be tricked into the plan.
?
Paul S wrote
at 15:28:40 on 22 February 2017
Having spent a while working through some the documentation, I can say that despite the GMSF Proposal being 248 pages - it was still a summary document that gave almost no detail about "why" it was needed. To get any "real" information you had to go into the GM SHMA (237 pages), the Integrated Assessment (331 pages) and other (huge) supporting documentation. Even then, some details require further reading. There was no clarity, just a sense of the woods being hidden by a huge amount of trees. If the general public "didn't get it", that (for the most part) was clearly not the public's fault. One thing is clear though, the numbers were always inflated at any opportunity. Central government guidelines contributed, as did guidance from groups like the LPEG. Rules designed to aid the housing market in the South East are being applied to the North West. The idea that the proposal represented "local housing demand" seemed farcical by the time I'd done some digging. Having spoken to a couple of councillors, it seems clear that the plan is to jam a house or housing estate into every tiny gap to increase council tax revenues and warehouses everywhere else to increase business rates income. A brief look at a population density map for the UK shows we have HUGE amounts of land within the UK we could build upon (Only 10% of UK land is built upon - though in fairness a lot is mountains, etc.). Sadly building houses, roads and infrastructure is expensive when the alternative is just building houses only within existing urban areas. Which is fine as long as you are happy to increase population density whilst failing to increase the (already creaking) supporting infrastructure in line, except perhaps some notable high profile projects which are large but will have little effect locally. Plus nobody is looking at a UK wide housing plan, beyond dumping the problem on councils who have no choice but to look for solutions exclusively within their own borders, whether that is practical or not.
?
Michael James Felse wrote
at 15:26:06 on 22 February 2017
and the more I have looked into the plans, the more it makes me feel the Greater Manchester Mayor race is questionable on consultation grounds. If I was one running the show I would promise the Greater Manchester residents' a referendum within the first two years. It has to be us who ratify or reject a Metro Mayor concept, otherwise I fear attempts for the new Mayor to build a Northern Powerhouse will fail, instead becoming a political battle run by Westminster dictates who I am reading will decide far too much what happens here in our North.
?
Michael James Felse wrote
at 11:13:21 on 21 February 2017
Because the GM Spatial Framework is an essential part of the created Greater Manchester Mayor role this is a further example to me that we the public were not properly consulted about Mayor creation. As over in South Yorkshire the new job should be deferred one year to allow a better framework. I here urge UKIP, English Democrats, The Green Party and Liberal Dems to demand the Conservative Prime Minister and her Minister Andrew Percy implements deferring on common ground of equal responsibility to South Yorkshire. This will save £4million and delay further destruction of our irreplaceable environment. I will write to Mr Paul Nuttall MEP today to ask UKIP to take this on board. Danger looms if one half of the North gets a Northern Power House deal while the East get delayed. To overcome the North-South economic divide that so clearly imbalances our UK economy the last thing we need is to create this West-East divide on our own doorstep. I believe our West-East must act together to jointly build a Post Brexit Northern Powerhouse. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-38614527
?
Gareth L wrote
at 11:13:09 on 21 February 2017
Looking at the plans, I just thought that they were wrote by the developers, for the developers. to line the pockets of the developers. Building on green field means higher profits than brown field sites. Still when the MCR Mayors gets in he/she has the sole say. Its great to live in this democracy!
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx