HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL TO WAIVE ANOTHER £1.6MILLION IN PLANNING FEES
 

Star date: 27th March 2015

DEVELOPERS IN ORDSALL AND WALKDEN TO BE LET OFF WITH £1.68MILLION AND PROVISION OF OVER 100 AFFORDABLE HOUSES

In the latest round of planning giveaways, Salford Council is set to waive obligations for the provision of 111 affordable houses and £1.68million in planning fees for developers building over five hundred flats and houses in Ordsall and Walkden.

If councillors accept Council officer recommendations, Countryside Properties will avoid over £450,000 in fees for its Walkden development, while Villafont Ltd and Simandhar Swami LLP will avoid a cool £1.2million in fees for building eight blocks of flats and shops, up to fifteen storeys high, by the riverside in Ordsall.

Full details here...


Yet again, Salford Council is set to waive £millions worth of fees and obligations for affordable housing at its planning panel meeting next week, if councillors approve proposals for hundreds of flats and houses in Walkden and Ordsall.

On Woden Street, by the riverside in Ordsall, Villafont Ltd and Simandhar Swami LLP are aiming to build 372 apartments, plus a resident's gym, cafe, shops and offices in eight blocks up to fifteen storeys high.

The flats are all for the Private Rental Sector (PRS) and, if Salford Council policy was followed, 20% of them, or 75 properties, would have to be set aside for affordable housing. Instead, following a report which stated the scheme wouldn't be `viable' if the developers had to provide these, the condition is set to be dropped – with the now-usual claw back arrangement for the money if the `viability' of the development improves in the future.

If a scheme isn't `viable' it means that the developer's profit isn't high enough.

The Ordsall developers should also be paying a total of £1,221,278 in planning obligations (Open Space: £648,718, Public Realm, Infrastructure and Heritage
£572,560
) but again these payments are set to be waived due to `viability' issues and the fact that the scheme will include some work on the riverside footpath, although not to the size `envisaged in the guidance'.

Meanwhile, in Walkden, Countryside Properties - which has already avoided £1.5million in planning fees in Broughton - is set to avoid a further £467,670 worth of payments.

Countryside wants to build 181 two, three and four bedroom houses on Linnyshaw Industrial Estate around Manchester Road and Moss Lane, despite residents' complaints about the impact of traffic.

Countryside should be paying £1,167,670 (Open Space: £463,450; Public Realm, infrastructure and heritage: £271,500 and Education: £432,720.75) – but has offered to cough up just £700,000 (£428,041.46 towards the expansion of St Paul's CofE Primary and £271,958.54 towards a cycle path between Walkden and Windmill Road) due, yet again, to `viability' issues.

Countryside should also be setting aside 20% of its development, or 36 properties, for affordable housing but this condition is also being waived, with a claw back arrangement in place should the developer hit maximum profits on the scheme.

Both applications are set to be discussed at Salford Council's planning panel next with recommendations to approve...


• See also previous Salford Star articles...

Salford Council refuses to reveal planning viability figures - click here

Public Scandal as community robbed to line developers' pockets - click here


Graphic by Steven Speed


Salford Star wrote
at 2:44:32 PM on Saturday, March 28, 2015
See White's comment below.. We reckon it's around £20million - see the link at the end of the article for the breakdown
 
white wrote
at 11:58:29 AM on Saturday, March 28, 2015
If Villafont do not pay the £1.2m it will cost them just over £3000 per apartment. Surely this does not make the whole scheme unviable, especially when one considers that they are not providing cheaper affordable units and the not inconsiderable rents they will get from the planned residents’ gym, the café, shops and offices. Similarly making the due payment would cost Countryside properties around £2500 per property. Surely they could afford this especially as the necessity to include, obviously cheaper, affordable housing has again been dropped These companies are trying it on, and what is worse, are getting away with it, through the ineptitude, or worse, of our council. Has anyone calculated the grand total of planning fees that our council has waived for various companies?
 
Bob Clarke wrote
at 8:59:42 AM on Saturday, March 28, 2015
Countryside are developing near us. Take a look at how the operate https://www.facebook.com/groups/1598478033731629/
 
Another wrote wrote
at 8:59:18 AM on Saturday, March 28, 2015
As "wrote" has said, the developers will not piss off while the fees keep being waived. The council should just say "Not viable? Ok we will deal with another developer unless you can come up with a scheme that is viable." If you added up all the developers fees that have been waived since the start of the cuts, Would they actually pay for all the services that have been cut?
 
Terry Brooks wrote
at 11:02:00 AM on Friday, March 27, 2015
I think its about time that the financial affairs of the people taking these decisions are investigated. Something smells to high heaven.
 
Paul Gerrard wrote
at 10:15:11 AM on Friday, March 27, 2015
Spot on, Mike Kelly. The developers are laughing all the way to the bank and thinking what a little treasure trove they have in Salford Council. This is wrong in so many ways - acres of renewable housing condemned and flattened, no new affordable houses built for a new generation of Salfordians, and no income to offset against the cuts they're always complaining about. Fight the Tories? This lot? Can't even tell when they're being fleeced.
 
wrote
at 10:15:02 AM on Friday, March 27, 2015
They will not piss off anywhere mike no other council are stupid enough to fall for the constant bleeding heart its not viable story these wide boys are constantly playing .only this council as the required amount of amateurs to be taken in by it again and again the communist dictatorship is alive and well and living in Salford . ho sorry forgot they don't live in Salford
 
Mike Kelly wrote
at 6:25:56 AM on Friday, March 27, 2015
Lots of Developers claiming viability issues when planning to build in Salford and the Council letting them off with payments. Question.........why build in the first place if its not viable ? Developers are riding on the crest of the expansion of Manchester especially in the Chapel St / Ordsall areas.....using the proximity of the development s to Manchester City Centre, if they cannot make the schemes work for the benefit of all including Salford and its residents why not just piss off and build elsewhere.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Shopping Centre
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PETER HOOK AND THE LIGHT TO DO NEW ORDER ALBUMS IN MANCHESTER
Nice one Hooky ... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL TO BORROW £38MILLION FOR OFFICE BLOCK
Phil all we no about you is your in love with the Mayor, credible alternative! well Phil at least we have the balls to put our hat... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL TO BORROW £38MILLION FOR OFFICE BLOCK
Felse, Ferrer, Oneil ... Be quiet. None of you are credible as an alternative to Labour. None of you has a genuine pedigree. Oneil... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL TO BORROW £38MILLION FOR OFFICE BLOCK
Salford's Labour controlled Council are sounding more like the Tories, protecting the wealthy and forgetting about the poor. 10 ... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL TO BORROW £38MILLION FOR OFFICE BLOCK
John will be thinking did our Labour Mayor know we are about to give £10million to an area 26 miles away as he delivered his said ... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD COUNCIL U-TURN ON NURSERY CLOSURE CONSULTATION

Star date: 22nd February 2018 

HUMILIATING CLIMBDOWN FOR SALFORD CITY MAYOR

Just two days after announcing that a consultation would begin on 26th February for closing Salford's five nurseries, this afternoon Salford Council announced that it is to be paused for a month.

Less than a week ago a huge Save Our Nurseries public meeting voted, against the wishes of Salford City Mayor, Paul Dennett, and Children's Lead Member, Lisa Stone, for the closure consultation to be stopped. In the face of growing anger from the community the Council has been forced into a humiliating climb down.

Full details here...

SALFORD UNIVERSITY LECTURERS STRIKE OVER POSSIBLE 40% PENSION CUT

Star date: 22nd February 2018

'THIS IS THE LAST STRAW'

Salford University lecturers went on strike today over an attack on their pensions, which their union, UCU, states could lead to a cut of between 20% and 40%.

Pickets were mounted at all entrances of the University, where UCU official Matt Arrowsmith told the Salford Star, "Our members feel this is the last straw...Nobody wants to be on strike but this is our last line of defence."

Full details here...

SALFORD COUNCIL TO BORROW £38MILLION FOR OFFICE BLOCK

Star date: 21st February 2018

COUNCIL TO BORROW £38.6MILLION FOR EMBANKMENT OFFICES

Cash strapped Salford City Council, currently mired in controversy over shutting its five nurseries, is to borrow £38.6million this year to 'invest' in its new 100 Embankment office block.

It's part of an overall £200million 'investment' in this block and its Two New Bailey block.

Full details here...

SALFORD COUNCIL NURSERY CLOSURE GOVERNMENT BOMBSHELL

Star date: 20th February 2018

GOVERNMENT REVEALS THAT SALFORD COUNCIL NEVER ASKED FOR FUNDING FLEXIBILITY

Salford City Council recently announced that it was proposing to close all five of its nurseries. And yesterday Children's Lead Member, Lisa Stone, said that it was "a direct result of Government changes, which reduce the use of Dedicated Schools Grant."

However, this afternoon a spokesperson for the Department for Education told the Salford Star that "Any council that had concerns…could apply to the department for increased flexibility" in the Grant's use. They added that "The Department has not received a request from Salford for increased flexibility…" This is bound to increase pressure on the City Mayor to hold off the consultation on the closures.

Full details here…

SALFORD RED DEVILS AUDITOR ‘CASTS DOUBT’ ABOUT ‘COMPANY’S ABILITY TO CONTINUE’

Star date: 19th February 2018

SALFORD REDS ACCOUNTS SHOW ALMOST £9MILLION LIABILITIES

New accounts published for the Salford Red Devils show that the company made losses of over £700,000 last year and that it has net liabilities of almost £9million, including the £1million loan from Salford City Council.

Despite the directors insisting that restructures and changes within the club forecast a 'modest profit', its auditor states that the conditions "indicate the existence of a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern".

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx