HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL SET TO WAIVE £1.5M FOR COUNTRYSIDE PROPERTIES PLANNING FEES
 

Star date: 13th February 2015

PLANNING SCANDAL CONTINUES AS COUNTRYSIDE SET TO AVOID £1.5M FEES

Having called it a `public scandal' less than a month ago, Salford Council is set to waive another £1.5million in planning fees for 147 new unaffordable houses in Lower Broughton being proposed by Countryside Properties on Meadow Road and off Tenerife Street.

Countryside is avoiding the fees by using the loophole that the scheme won't be `viable' if it is has to pay the Council, in line with virtually every single major planning application that has come before the planning panel recently.

Full details here...


The Meadows
click image to enlarge

The amounts of planning obligation money being lost to Salford is mounting up yet again, just weeks after councillors called it a `public scandal' and the Salford Star calculated a figure of around £20million (see previous Salford Star article – click here).

The latest planning proposals that are set to see over £1.5million in planning fees waived are for two housing development schemes in Lower Broughton by Countryside Properties, which will be discussed at the planning panel next week, with officers recommending approval.

The first is for 93 three and four bedroom houses in Meadow Road, on the site of the former University Meadows Campus right by the banks of the River Irwell with lovely views.

The planning report shows that Countryside should be paying a total of £1,226,341.46 (Open Space £463,450; Public Realm, infrastructure and heritage £271,500; Construction Training £27,150; Climate Change £36,200 and Education £428,041.46)...

The report notes that there will be "increased pressure on existing primary school provision", and that the "significant number of additional residents" would "create more intensive use of existing open space facilities in the vicinity of the site, creating increased wear and tear that would result in the need for additional maintenance and refurbishment"...

...However, "the applicant has undertaken an appraisal of the viability of the development and this shows that if a commuted sum is sought from the scheme, it would render the scheme entirely unviable..."

So Countryside is proposing to pay absolutely nothing, with only a `claw back' agreement in place for the future, while proposing no affordable housing, even though this should make up 19 houses on the development (20%) to help alleviate what the report calls a "high level of affordable housing need".

Countryside Properties has already had £millions in public subsidies for the `redevelopment' of what it calls `New Broughton' (see previous Salford Star article – click here), which has seen affordable housing replaced by unaffordable housing and what many regard as the `social cleansing' of the area.

"The proposals will build on the successful work achieved in earlier phases and help to realise long-standing aspirations for the area" state the planning officers.

Meanwhile, the application is also running ragged over Salford's ecological policies, with the development's boundary extending into The Meadows itself, the so-called `green lung' in the city. The planners report states that "Although development of land east of Meadow Road would be in conflict with the objectives of saved Policy R4, the wider benefits of the development are considered to outweigh the loss."

The Countryside houses will be located in Flood Zones 2 and 3, and within, what the report calls, "a critical drainage area". It adds that the scheme "is not technically in compliance with Flood Risk and Development Planning Guidance Policy FRD5" but "the LPA are satisfied that the proposals are within the spirit, if not the letter, of policy FRD5 and that it would not be appropriate to insist on strict volumetric balancing as part of these proposals."

The report also notes that a "large number of the recorded trees are proposed for removal", including one group of `category A trees'. Yet there's no Tree Protection Plan in place yet, and, while felled trees are normally replaced by a 2:1 ratio, in this case a 1:1 basis "is considered more realistic". Meanwhile as the site is cleared, the report states that there will be "reasonable avoidance measures" used to try and protect the toads, bats, smooth newts and hedgehogs that will no doubt be de-homed.

"In light of the above" the report concludes "it is considered that the development would not have a detrimental or irreversible impact on ecology therefore the proposal is considered to be acceptable in this regard."

The second Countryside Properties application is for 54 two and three bedroom houses off Tenerife Street near Great Clowes Street. Again, 20%, or 11, of the units should be for affordable housing, while there should be planning fees of £296,872.02 (Open Space £113,022; Public Realm, infrastructure and heritage £81,000; Construction Training £8,100; Climate Change £10,800 and Education £83,950.02) – but Countryside are not even proposing to pay the 2p, only to enter into a `claw back' agreement should their profits be excessive.


* See also previous Salford Star article - Salford Council refuses to reveal planning viability figures under Freedom of Information - click here


Graphic by Steven Speed

Salford Lad wrote
at 2:24:32 AM on Sunday, February 15, 2015
It is time for precious greenspaces to be ring-fenced for conservation and no development, in Salford and on a wider scale ! Why not concentrate on the housing and flats that we already have ? Or does that not fit in with the narrow agendas that developers, "business leaders" and Neo-liberal politicians have ? SAVE THE MEADOWS !
 
Anon wrote
at 8:41:32 AM on Saturday, February 14, 2015
I think at the very least, the council should be clear what viability actually means. Exactly what %age profit is needed to persuade developers to build in salford rather than elsewhere. 10%? 15%? 20% 25%? And we still have no detail on the assumptions that underpin these viability assessments. Oh to be a fly on the wall in Urban Vision's offices in Eccles.
 
marianne wrote
at 7:12:38 AM on Saturday, February 14, 2015
They re digging up peel park soon for more university student digs ?? Or am i wrong??
 
Michael F in Felse wrote
at 7:12:15 AM on Saturday, February 14, 2015
We must accept that not all areas are going to be viable attractions for builders. With the upward image of SalFord taking bite let us be pleased and thankful these developers for gambling their money into Salford. It all goes to show Salford's future is excellent.
 
Not viable wrote
at 2:07:31 PM on Friday, February 13, 2015
The council should tell the developers that it is sorry that the schemes are not viable and that they look forward seeing plans for a "Viable" scheme from Countryside or some other developer in the near future.
 
The Fat End of The Wedge wrote
at 2:07:26 PM on Friday, February 13, 2015
"the wider benefits of the development are considered to outweigh the loss" - what benefits? Oh, they must mean the developers! "large number of the recorded trees are proposed for removal" - another development leading to the destruction of mature trees. Remember the 100+ that went for Tesco Pendleton? And many others have fallen for other central Salford development. Tree replacement is with young trees, which take many years to mature, assuming they survive - thus not much living space for wildlife for a bit. Also, with pollution levels as they are (and increasing through development), trees should be considered a very important health resource. Mature trees should be left as they are AND fresh should be planted in every available spot. Our councils and government are so very short sighted. Anybody watch 'The Super Rich and Us' on Beeb recently? There was a clip of an event where councils from around Britain were queueing up to sell off their land to foreign property investors - didn't see Salford, but just shows its happening everywhere - short term gain, extremely long term pain.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Brexit Salford
stephensons ad 1
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD POLIO SUFFERER WAS TRAPPED UPSTAIRS FOR THREE MONTHS AS HOUSING ASSOCIATION WON’T FIT LIFT
When I see all the gold, gems and original art owned by Salford Council then reading the problems forced on local people it to me ... [more]
article: GREATER MANCHESTER PRE-BUDGET RALLY HEARS CALLS TO BRING DOWN TORY GOVERNMENT
I thank the Tory Chsncellor for his budget, but clearly not aimed at reviving the North West to the necessary level of health and ... [more]
article: COURT THROWS OUT SALFORD SCHOOL FINE FOR MUM WHO KEPT SERIOUSLY ILL SON AT HOME
I demand our elected Mayor calls in all our head teachers to an Education Legal Rights Executive meeting to ensure nothing in Salf... [more]
article: COURT THROWS OUT SALFORD SCHOOL FINE FOR MUM WHO KEPT SERIOUSLY ILL SON AT HOME
maybe if she had communicated with the school as well as she has with The Star, she would not have been in such a position... [more]
article: SALFORD POLIO SUFFERER WAS TRAPPED UPSTAIRS FOR THREE MONTHS AS HOUSING ASSOCIATION WON’T FIT LIFT
What used to be the case was this. If special work needed to be done, to enable a disabled person to live in ,or continue to live ... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

HUGE COST OF SHUTTING SALFORD DISABLED CHILDREN’S HOME QUESTIONED BY UNISON

Star date: 24th November 2017

SUGGESTED COST OF £250,000 EACH TO MOVE CHILDREN FROM THE GRANGE

Salford City UNISON has written to the Salford Mayor and councillors about the huge cost of moving children from The Grange to placements outside the borough, which it suggests could be as high as £250,000 per child.

Salford Mayor, Paul Dennett, made the decision to shut the city's only home for disabled children but UNISON reckons it would cost more to close the facility than to keep it open. Meanwhile, solicitors representing one of the young people at the Grange are awaiting a judge's decision for a judicial review into the closure.

Full details here...

SALFORD POLIO SUFFERER WAS TRAPPED UPSTAIRS FOR THREE MONTHS AS HOUSING ASSOCIATION WON’T FIT LIFT

Star date: 23rd November 2017  

DISABLED SALIX HOMES TENANT TOLD TO FIND NEW PROPERTY

Salix Homes tenant, Thomas West, has a worsening polio condition that meant the stairlift at his house in Weaste needed alterations but then kept breaking down, leaving him trapped upstairs for three months at one point.

Thomas has been advised by Salford Council that he needs a vertical lift fitted but Salix Homes state it is against their policy and have asked him to consider moving to 'more suitable accommodation'... "I don't want to move" he says, suspecting financial concerns are being put before his needs.

Full details here...

COURT THROWS OUT SALFORD SCHOOL FINE FOR MUM WHO KEPT SERIOUSLY ILL SON AT HOME

Star date: 22nd November 2017

HIS BROTHER HAD ALREADY DIED OF SAME ILLNESS BUT 'HEARTLESS' SCHOOL FINED MUM FOR UNAUTHORISED ABSENCES

"He wasn't going out enjoying himself; he was actually at home trying to breathe..."

A judge at Manchester and Salford Magistrates' Court has thrown out a fine given by Buile Hill Visual Arts College to mum, Nicola Newns, for 'unauthorised absences' of her son, Jacob, despite him suffering from the same serious illness that tragically took the life of his younger brother, Ben, a few years ago.

Court papers showed that the school complained it took them two hours once to contact Nicola – when she was actually in an ambulance with Jacob on the way to A&E; and then couldn't contact her for four days...when she was sat by his bed in intensive care "Praying he gets better".

Full details here...

GREATER MANCHESTER PRE-BUDGET RALLY HEARS CALLS TO BRING DOWN TORY GOVERNMENT

Star date: 21st November 2017

'ARROGANT AND CRUEL' TORY GOVERNMENT GOT TO GO SAY JULIE HESMONDHALGH, TRADE UNIONISTS AND LABOUR COUNCILLORS

Tonight, a Pre-Budget rally on the steps of GMex in Manchester heard constant calls for the 'arrogant and cruel' Tory Government to be brought down.

Speakers at the Manchester People's Assembly rally included trade unionists, Labour Party councillors, the Canon of Manchester Cathedral, plus a message from Julie Hesmondhalgh condemning the Tories' "Unspeakable acts of injustice...against the most vulnerable in our society".

Full details here...

SALFORD SALIX HOMES DISABLED RESIDENT SUICIDE ATTEMPT AS CRIES FOR HELP IGNORED

Star date: 21st November 2017

'HORRIFIED' PARENTS TELL OF SALIX 'TURNING BACK' ON DISABLED SON 

"We can't understand how anyone can let a company do this to a vulnerable person forcing him to try and take his own life..."

The parents of a disabled man living in a Salix Homes flat off Blackfriars Road have written to the Salford City Mayor, Salford MP and local councillors after their son tried to commit suicide in a motorway car park.

The email states that Salix refused to help deal with anti-social behaviour and disability access issues, and "refused to accept that he is even disabled" despite him receiving full PIP... "The fact that his urgent cries for help have been ignored and his landlords have turned their back on him and instructed solicitors rather than provide the help that he urgently needs is horrifying".

Full details and email here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx