HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD CITY COUNCIL MOTION ON CLADDING DRAWS HYPOCRISY ACCUSATION
 

Star date: 11th March 2021

SALFORD COUNCIL CLADDING MOTION IGNORES ITS OWN NINE PENDLETON BLOCKS

A motion on the cladding scandal by Salford City Mayor, Paul Dennett, and Councillor Ann-Marie Humphreys, to be put before a full meeting of Salford Council next week, has drawn accusations of hypocrisy from social housing tenants in the nine Pendleton blocks owned by Salford Council.

The motion centres on "thousands of private leaseholders" and the "cruel effect on Salford resident's mental health, leaving them in unsafe homes and facing life-changing bills" – but states nothing about tenants in its own Pendleton blocks who have suffered with similar issues, and generally been ignored, or "left to rot" as one tenant puts it..

Full details here...


"Salford Council, our local ward councillors and MP Rebecca Long Bailey have ignored our plight, ignored fire risk assessments, ignored astronomical heating costs, ignored the effect on our mental health and left us to rot..." Malus Court tenant


Next week, a motion is being put forward to the full meeting of Salford City Council on the cladding scandal, as its four years since the Grenfell Tower tragedy in June. Within the city, the motion notes that...

"Thousands of Salford residents are still living in buildings, and that number continues to rise, including disabled people who face compounding difficulties including lack of specific support for their needs, additional financial pressures, and the potential exacerbation of health conditions...
 
"Thousands of private leaseholders in Salford are paying inflated insurance and service charge costs to cover the on-going costs of waking watches, often running into hundreds of pounds every month, and will soon be faced with demands for tens of thousands of pounds more to remedy the fire safety defects" it states "Moreover, they are unable even to sell or re-mortgage their defective properties because of a broken EWS1 process and mortgage lenders un-willingness to lend on them..."

The motion, to be proposed by Councillor Ann-Marie Humphreys and seconded by Salford City Mayor, Paul Dennett, adds that the City Council believes that the cladding crisis "has had and continues to have a cruel effect on Salford resident's mental health, leaving them in unsafe homes and facing life-changing bills..."*

While the motion is to be welcomed and needed for private leaseholders, it doesn't state anything about Salford social housing tenants living in the nine Pendleton blocks actually owned by Salford Council and managed by Pendleton Together, who have equally suffered for almost four years...

"Yet again, we as social housing tenants are bottom of Salford Council list" says Malus Court resident Graeme Langton who has tirelessly fought for improved fire safety conditions on the blocks, which have also seen tenants freezing as the cladding has been removed.

"We at Malus Court have been fighting for justice since Grenfell" he adds "I myself have travelled around country raising awareness of our plight including a speech in the House of Commons, and at union conferences. Salford Council, our local ward councillors and MP Rebecca Long Bailey have ignored our plight, ignored fire risk assessments, ignored astronomical heating costs, ignored the effect on our mental health and left us to rot. But they quite happy to raise the private sector issues on cladding.

"Some might say double standards, but me personally says it is discrimination to those less well off" he explains "This is why some tenants at Malus Court have taken legal action as we have been left with no choice, when those so called elected ward councillors John Warmisham, Gina Reynolds, Mayor Paul Dennett and MP Rebecca Long Bailey have left us to rot."

Indeed, part of the motion, seconded by the City Mayor, actually praises and thanks himself for "the on-going work of the Greater Manchester High-Rise Taskforce chaired by the Mayor of Salford" (point 1.6 and 3.0 see below**)

"They should do the decent thing and resign and be replaced by people who care about those in the social sector" says Graeme "They have a duty of care to the residents in Salford, not just the private sector. The Council is a joke. The company who they are taking to court for the mess we are in is still receiving Council contracts, although the Council reply to that is that the company in question has now split into two parts?

"The Malus Court Action Group has now had experts look at our plight and their reports, including fire risk, will be submitted to the barristers to move the legal action on" he concludes.

Meanwhile, Ruth London, from Fuel Poverty Action, whilst welcoming the motion for private leaseholders, also criticises the Council for ignoring social tenants...

"Great to see this motion and the demands to help leaseholders who've been going through the nightmare of flammable cladding and its slow removal from their buildings" she says, adding "It's a shame that the motion says nothing about social housing tenants, like those in Salford's Pendleton estate who have been cut off from any government funding, as victims of a PFI refurbishment. 

"They have only recently had cladding removed and are now freezing without insulation on their high rise flats, and with only minimal compensation for the huge extra costs of heating" she adds "This issue affects both leaseholders and tenants and should be included in a 'Salford Ask'.  Tenants, like leaseholders, should be central to developing these local demands. Many round the country, like ourselves, would then support them."


* For the full text of the cladding motion see below...

For a full background see previous Salford Star articles...

Freezing Salford Tenants Stuck In Pendleton Blocks – click here

Fuel Poverty In Pendleton 'A Matter of National Concern' – click here

Over 100 Salford Tenants To Take Pendleton Together and Salford Council To Court – click here


** Salford Council Cladding Motion to be moved by Councillor Ann-Marie Humphreys and seconded by the City Mayor....

This City Council notes that:

1.0 despite nearly four years passing since the fire at Grenfell Tower on the 14th June 2017, which tragically claimed 72 people's lives and injured more than 70 people, the fire at Grenfell Tower further uncovered the growing industrial and regulatory scandal in the built environment across England;

1.1 thousands of Salford residents are still living in buildings, and that number continues to rise, including disabled people who face compounding difficulties including lack of specific support for their needs, additional financial pressures, and the potential exacerbation of health conditions;

 1.2 thousands of private leaseholders in Salford are paying inflated insurance and service charge costs to cover the on-going costs of waking watches, often running into hundreds of pounds every month, and will soon be faced with demands for tens of thousands of pounds more to remedy the fire safety defects. Moreover, they are unable even to sell or re-mortgage their defective properties because of a broken EWS1 process and mortgage lenders un-willingness to lend on them;

1.3 every year the housebuilders responsible for these defective properties bank billions in profits and pay out millions in dividends to shareholders, with The Independent also reporting back in June of last year that since Boris Johnson became Prime Minister the Conservative Party has received more than £11 million in donations from property developers[i] and The Times more recently highlighting that property developers who built flats covered in dangerous cladding have donated £2.5 million to the Conservative Party since the tragic fire at Grenfell Tower in 2017.

1.4 the Government has provided no funding to correct fire safety defects that are not related to cladding systems or in buildings less than 18 metres tall and the £15 billion expected cost of all remediations as highlighted by the Homes, Communities and Local Government Committee in summer last year, is almost three times the £5 billion designated to rectify the industrial and regulatory crisis so far.

1.5 the Government has also cut the City Council's overall core funding from central government by 53% since 2010/11, reducing the City Council's overall local authority spending power and forcing authorities to raise council tax and precepts in order to maintain vital services such as enforcing building regulations. Salford City Council alone has lost over £222 million in cuts and un-funded budget pressures since 2010/11.

1.6 the on-going work of the Greater Manchester High-Rise Taskforce chaired by the Mayor of Salford and the work of the End Our Cladding Scandal campaign, which has brought together local campaigns, including Manchester Cladiators from across the country and proposed a Ten Step action plan to support residents in Salford and address the industrial and regulatory crisis swiftly and comprehensively across the whole of England.

This City Council believes that:

2.0 the industrial and regulatory crisis is a scandal that punishes leaseholders and residents of Salford for systemic problems with building safety regulations and methods of development in England;

2.1 this has had and continues to have a cruel effect on Salford resident's mental health, leaving them in unsafe homes and facing life-changing bills;

2.2 it is grossly unjust that residents who bought homes in good faith should face remediation costs;

2.3 the Government's Building Safety Fund is inadequate both in scope and amount, failing to protect all leaseholders from costs as requirements for remediation are accelerated;    

2.4 the Government must right broken promises, return to the original premise that no costs should be passed onto residents/leaseholders, abandon the loan schemes and two-tiered system for financial support recently announced by the Government, and act quickly;

2.5 a viable route to remediation is for payment nationally to fall on the building industry coupled with a 'pay now, litigate later' approach as recently developed by the Australian Labour Party State Government in Victoria;

 2.6 developers who delivered dangerous and unsafe buildings due to negligence and poor workmanship should remediate this work rather than expecting residents/leaseholders to pay;

2.7 we support the End Our Cladding Scandal campaign and endorse their Ten Step action plan which recognises that the knock-on effects mean that the industrial and regulatory crisis will not be resolved building by building, leaseholder by leaseholder.

This City Council resolves to:

3.0 thank the Greater Manchester High-Rise Taskforce [chaired by the City Mayor], End Our Cladding Scandal campaign and Manchester Cladiators for their efforts in fighting this injustice, and to continue supporting them in their work and their campaigning;
3.1 continue supporting the End our Cladding Scandal campaign's 10-step plan to tackle this crisis, calling on the Government to endorse and implement 10-step plan in order to make safe all buildings - regardless of height or specific fire safety defects in order to protect residents and give them the peace of mind they are rightly entitled to;

3.2 call on the Government to provide the necessary funding in order to protect all innocent residents/leaseholders caught up in the industrial and regulatory crisis from ruinous costs that threaten bankruptcy or homelessness through a 'pay now, litigate later' approach as recently developed by the Australian Labour Party State Government in Victoria;

3.3 ask the Chief Executive of Salford City Council to write to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government to ask Government to accede to those asks articulated in End our Cladding Scandal campaign's 10-step plan;

3.4 continue providing practical support to affected Salford residents/leaseholders, including asking the Planning Department to prioritise applications for fire-related remediation work, asking the Lead Members for Housing and Planning & Sustainable Development to continue to work with local groups and help affected Salford residents/leaseholders;

3.5 continue acting inclusively on this issue, including actively involving affected disabled people, raising awareness of their specific issues and campaigning;

3.6 ask the Lead Members for Housing and Planning & Sustainable Development to work alongside Salford's Members of Parliament to develop a 'Salford Ask' outlining the funding required to remediate affected buildings in our city, saving Salford residents/leaseholders from hardship, un-fair costs and worse consequences.

 

 

Felsey wrote
at 17:17:30 on 15 March 2021
Hi Bob friend, please steady on. It won’t cost these millionaires a dime. It simply means their development businesses will pay the Mayoral surcharge for the cladding and residents‘ compensation and offset it in their Company business tax accounts. In short this becomes a round about way of getting £80million of business tax diverted back into Salford from the Tory Government who should be happy to help level up on improving better safer housing in the North. After all levelling up is a key Conservative Party Manifesto pledge and if I was Mayor I would fully hold them to account.
?
Bob wrote
at 11:55:55 on 15 March 2021
Good socialist thinking from Felsey there. Yes lets tax the bollocks out of all these tax haven property developers,people like John Whiticker who lives in the Isle of Man. while were at it, lets tax the arse out of people like Fred Done and his brother. These 2 pay £171 million pounds a year each in tax, more than enough to pay all the dole money in Salford, and are the 3rd and 4th biggest taxpayers in britain, and they can still afford to live here.Lets tax them so much that they fuck off abroad and pay nothing.What will we do for tax then? I know, lets go and see if we can find any millionaires on the quays to tax.
?
Bob wrote
at 10:44:24 on 15 March 2021
Well Arnold, I suppose thats the turd issue clarified.Lets talk about the damp walls ceilings Etc.I am sick of explaining this. This is a problem that's easy sorted. The dampness originates from water vapor created by the residents themselves, through cooking and drying clothes, showers etc, and not opening windows to let the build up of moisture out. The tenants are reluctant to open windows as they feel it "lets the heat out" that they have paid for. The housing people and their contractors know this is the problem, but they are too afraid of the tenants to tell them so. This condensation in the air did not happen before,as the flats with the old windows were not as airtight as they are now.Condensation just builds up.The simple remedy to this problem is to install a heat recovery air management system. I don't mean the cheaper pressurization system that some housing groups use.The proper system takes the moisture out of the air and sends it into the waste water system.The reason they dont put these things in,is because it would cost a couple of grand for each one and be tricky to install.Such a system to work in all rooms should have been put in when the places were done up and re-wired, with new false ceilings to hide the ducting.The housing groups have wasted so much cash, they don't have any left to pay for things like I mentioned.The only answer in my opinion, is to get in touch with these people who sue the bollocks off these housing groups. These housing knobs can always find money for greedy lawyers, lets see how it pans out.The money thats been wasted on housing in our city over the years just makes me sick.The slums people live in are worse than ever, will this problem ever be solved? I doubt it.
?
graeme langton wrote
at 10:43:34 on 15 March 2021
This may or maybe not true, but it does not reflect the %99 of residents. Also what has it got to do with the motion of what council members are submitting to council meeting. The article reflects how little the council thinks of social housing tenants compared to private sector . They have done nothing for social sector and their article is an admission to that fact. We are not saying private sector do not deserve justice. We are saying what about us as they own our properties. Also social housing tents have had an extra 3 years of hell.The mental health and stress is a major fact. Heating bills so high residents can not afford put their heating on running into hundreds and more. Some elderly residents are going bed to stay warm. The quality of workmanship on the 9 blocks is shameful and we have proof from experts hired to back these claims. So lets stick to the article which is asking for Salford council to accept their failings and treat social housing residents the same respect they showing lease holders or we set a 2 tier devide or is that their aim to push us out for more greedy private contractors move in and rip the heart out of Salford.
?
Felsey wrote
at 10:03:37 on 15 March 2021
Labour must meet the residents needs. I want Salford Council to surcharge across all property builders including the Port Salford ones in getting a big enough cash demand to sort the cladding for good and to compensate those residents with a £10,000 sorry payment. It is time for all developers to face the music together.
?
Arnold Rimmer wrote
at 18:26:25 on 14 March 2021
Yep. It happened. Early 2000s. My dad was a project manager on one of the buildings overseeing the replacements and it was thrown onto the work men on the scaffolding. This was also around the same time they had to start wearing stab vests when doing inspections of the inside of properties due to a number of incidents of aggressive residents who didn't like letting staff in to see why their ceiling was damp.
?
bob wrote
at 10:50:57 on 13 March 2021
Well Arnold,the balls in your court,did this turd chucking incident happen or not? was it reported to the Police or any other authority.?Perhaps it was just a bit of wishful thinking about how the residents could even up the score that got carried away into reality by idle gossip? Let us know.
?
paul kelly wrote
at 00:48:43 on 13 March 2021
A kick in the teeth motion to the poorest and most vulnerable a slight against Salfordians who were born and bred in this city and have worked for the benefit of this city from generation to generation often suffering from the ravages and destruction of this rotten system. Graeme Langton and the tenants suffering from the cold and the insecurity of living in unfit dangerous housing conditions should have been at the front of any work to put right the scandal of the cladding outrage they should be fully compensated for the massive increase in stress and worry they have suffered.It is certainly not the time for any pats on the backs celebrations can only begin when all the tenants are back living in secure warm accommodation these people have done no wrong they are the victims of decades of the running down of council housing the victims of people and businesses greedy money grubbers who when they do not do a job properly and walk away and do not have the Honor or integrity to put it right a great prevalance in this rancid selfish society. i along with many of them people being left in misery were taught that if you did a job that was wrong you put it right at your own expense if you needed to a principle i have always believed in and because these unprincipled shysters who have taken the money and run Graeme and the other tenants have had to go to the courts for redress this is something that could have been avoided if the tenants had been treated right in the first place and a rent freeze should have been the starting point along with free security fire watchers.Arnold Rimmer you have made a judgemental and disgusting unfounded comment concerning this story Graham and the other tenants deserve help and and support not snide remarks from the likes of you a bit of empathy is what is needed here. all the best to Graeme and the other tenants.
?
OLD CIGARETTE wrote
at 16:55:35 on 12 March 2021
Arnold, you are a disgraceful little lickspittle. Chances are you still live at home with your mother. You talk of the irony of some of the complaining people being ones who demanded compensation for the noise of the work. Have you, you Cuck, ever experienced the sheer hell of being stuck on what is, in effect an ongoing construction site, for years and years on end? Those tenants DESERVE some type of Disturbance Money. They have endured the misery of this work going on for years. And back before the Clowncil offloaded their stock into the grateful and greedy hands of the Social Landlords, the Clowncil would have had to have paid the tenants about four grand each in Disturbance Money. But the Social Landlords, greedy grasping bastards that they are, won't even have provided tenants with decent quality earplugs in order to combat the irreversible damage to their ears from listening to power drills going off for hours per day, month after month, year after year ...
?
Kev wrote
at 16:52:28 on 12 March 2021
Residents should sign up with Tenant Claim, what have you got to lose? At the very least it will force people to do something.
?
Bob wrote
at 12:01:51 on 12 March 2021
I do hope that Arnold Rimmer can substantiate the very serious allegations he makes against these residents. I suspect he can,but in my heart I hope they are not true. If it is true ,this sort of disgusting behavior plays right into the hands of the right wing tory bigots who hate working class people.I have long said that you cant have people living in accommodation while major refurb work is carried out. The knobs in suits think you can, and they always win the argument.I cringe when I think of all the cash wasted on these knackered old blocks.Proper new housing could be built for a fraction of the price.
?
graeme langton wrote
at 09:12:19 on 12 March 2021
Perhaps some people need to understand that everyone is equal private sector and social hosing tenants to the same respect. The council document clearly ignores social housing residents. It was Salford Council who with PFI put us in this mess and have not been near us in last 4yrs. Fire risk assessments clearly show we have major issues like fire doors unfit for use and other major issues soon to be released in court proceedings. We have windows, most not sealed letting water in each time it rains.The list goes on and on.When a fire risk assessment states risk to life substantial do you not understand how serious that is but to make comments about residents alledgedly throwing items out of windows.Then we have our Mayor wanting pat on back for what he say's he has done for private sector but alludes to mention what he has done for social sector. We do not know what or if they have acquired anything to replace our flammable cladding or fire doors replaced. What about the mental health of residents in social sector ?We in social sector are asking for same respect and concerns shown to leaseholders. Ask yourself does Salford mayor deserve pat on back for how he has handled the social tenants sector ? So please instead of commenting on a few tenants who may or may not have thrown things out of windows and concentrate on the %99 other tenants still living in conditions dangerous to health.Or do you not believe that the council which has had 4yrs to replace defected fire doors deserve a pat on the back.
?
wrote
at 00:15:48 on 12 March 2021
what are you hiding bob.
?
Arnold Rimmer wrote
at 20:50:49 on 11 March 2021
The irony is some of the people complaining in the blocks will be the same ones that threw their own faeces and urine down onto council workers replacing their windows with double glazing or demanded compensation for the noise caused in doing the work.
?
Bob wrote
at 15:37:11 on 11 March 2021
People who live in Glass town halls should not throw stones.What this crafty bunch are after is the government to chip in for the pendlton together fiasco.I know they have funds for that from the government, but I have a sneeking feeling the government will expect the council to sue those in the blame. I wouldn't mind betting the council have something to hide on this one. Something that a potential deffendant in a civil law suit could use as a defended. It just gets worse with this lot.
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx