HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD UKIP GENERAL ELECTION CANDIDATE STANDS DOWN OVER ‘ODIOUS’ INTEGRATION AGENDA
 

Star date: 27th April 2017

CANDIDATE CITES 'IGONORANT', 'UNACCEPTABLE', 'VILE'... 'RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY' AND 'MUSLIM BASHING' OF UKIP

"I do not wish to have my good name sullied by association with this odious agenda..." Seamus Martin

Seamus Martin, who was expected to be announced as the prospective UKIP candidate for Salford and Eccles, has withdrawn from standing, 'appalled' at the party's 'so-called Integration Agenda', which he describes as 'Muslim-bashing'.

Speaking exclusively to the Salford Star, Seamus says it's an "odious agenda"...an "alienation agenda aimed at deliberately demonising one specific community..."

He adds that UKIP's call for a moratorium on Muslim state schools is "ignorant and unacceptable", and that "This vile agenda was sneaked through without the knowledge or consent of UKIP party members..."

Full interview here...


UKIP
click image to enlarge

"...incessant anti-Islam invective has made our party look and sound like the spiritual heirs to the Jew-baiters of the 1930s..." Seamus Martin


Seamus Martin, who was expected to be announced as the prospective UKIP candidate for Salford and Eccles, has withdrawn from standing for the party at the forthcoming General Election. Below we print an exclusive statement as to the reasons why he won't be standing...


"Like many others in UKIP I am deeply dismayed at the party's so-called Integration Agenda and am even more appalled at what was said by our official spokespersons at their press conference. To my mind, these policies could be more accurately described as an alienation agenda aimed at deliberately demonising one specific community.

Despite unconvincing assurances to the contrary, it is, I fear, exactly as LeaveEU founder and leading UKIP donor, Arron Banks, described it - nothing short of a 'war on the Muslim religion'.

I pay tribute to Mr. Banks and Bill Etheridge MEP for speaking out on this issue and especially to UKIP MEP James Carver for the courageous leadership he has shown in resigning in protest as our Foreign and Commonwealth spokesman.

I too feel I must make a stand. I do not wish to have my good name sullied by association with this odious agenda and the unremittingly hostile attitudes underlying it.

While the Integration Agenda remains official policy and those behind it retain senior roles in our party, I cannot in good conscience stand for election under the UKIP banner at present.

So with a heavy heart, and with apologies to those of my neighbours in Salford and Eccles who ordinarily would want to vote UKIP for positive and decent reasons, I am withdrawing as a UKIP prospective parliamentary candidate at the 2017 General Election. And I encourage other UKIP candidates who share these concerns to consider their own positions.

I view the call for a moratorium on Muslim state schools as ignorant and unacceptable - either we have no state-sector faith schools at all or else each community has as many as it needs commensurate with its share of the school-age population. And I consider the proposed ban on Islamic religious law and the tribunals which administer it as particularly egregious.

Freedom of religion is a fundamental human right. And as a committed libertarian I believe that as long as you can finance your own lifestyle and you cause no harm to others, then the state should leave people in peace, as individuals and voluntary groupings of individuals such as faith communities, to live your life the way you want to, no matter how weird and perhaps not so wonderful your personal choices and lifestyle may appear to others.

Where will all this end? Are we also going to ban Jewish Beth Din courts or the General Synod of the Church of England? Will we be closing down the Catholic Church until they ordain women priests? That is the ridiculous yet logical conclusion.

In short, political parties should stay out of the theological, moral and internal governance affairs of religious organisations. People can be as prejudiced at they like in their personal capacity, however lamentable that may be, but no political party, especially not a libertarian party like UKIP, has any business putting forward religious bigotry as official policy.

I am aghast at this new direction of travel by UKIP, or should I say by a small clique of hardliners who have come to the fore since Nigel Farage stood down as our leader.

I have been told by more than one member of our ruling body, the UKIP National Executive Committee which is elected by party members, that the Integration Agenda was not even discussed in advance never mind ratified by the NEC. And it is clear from James Carver's resignation that there was minimal, if any, consultation even with our MEPs let alone with approved and vetted parliamentary candidates like myself or the wider party membership.

I am confident that the reason for this lack of consultation on the Integration Agenda is that those behind it know only too well that had we been aware of it in advance, we would have shot it down in flames before it ever saw the light of day. For, in the first UKIP leadership election of 2016 one candidate did indeed run on an overtly anti-Muslim platform which also included a ban on Muslim state schools and religious courts, and three-quarters of our party membership promptly voted for other candidates!

This vile agenda was sneaked through without the knowledge or consent of UKIP party members – rank and file and governing body alike. We were presented with a fait accompli. Those responsible should now reflect on the untold damage they have caused to UKIP at this crucial moment in the history of both our party and country. In these tumultuous times, just when Britain needs UKIP to provide visionary leadership more than ever, they have lost the plot and let the country down.

It beggars belief that with all that is going on in Britain and the wider world at present, our UKIP general election campaign has been launched with this offensive and divisive not to mention probably electorally disastrous Muslim-bashing agenda at the forefront.

Across the political spectrum the vast majority of British voters are good people who stand up for decency and fairness and consign boorish bullies to electoral oblivion, and rightly so. We in UKIP are, can be and should be among the good guys.

We like to proclaim ourselves as the party of common sense. Let us also always be the party of common decency - a party that listens, that shows respect to others and seeks to understand where they are coming from, a party that recognises that just because some people are different, it does not follow that they are inherently disloyal or dangerous.

At this general election there are so many genuinely radical, innovative and positive policies we in UKIP could have led with. For example, off the top of my head, Universal Basic Income, Direct Democracy - Regular referendums on key issues, a drastic reduction in the number of MPs - 200 for England down from 533, half of MPs to be women, proportional representation and constitutional reform, explicitly defining UKIP as a pro-peace party that will stand up to the regime-change warmongers in Westminster and Washington D.C .

Ideas like these could have energised the British people, shown that UKIP is much more than a one-trick Brexit pony, and enthused people to come out and vote for us in unprecedented numbers. But instead, to quote Arron Banks, we are now heading in 'entirely the wrong direction'.

We cannot un-break the rotten egg that is the Integration Agenda, and now, no matter how excellent, whatever policies UKIP does unveil during the rest of this general election campaign, they will be irretrievably tainted by its stench.

Sadly, a malign, reactionary and authoritarian element within UKIP has been permitted to take centre stage - people who have allowed new life to be breathed into the old lie that UKIP is 'the BNP in blazers'; people who have now lent legitimacy to everything that groups like Hope Not Hate have ever accused us of; people who through their incessant anti-Islam invective has made our party look and sound like the spiritual heirs to the Jew-baiters of the 1930s. Different era, different target, but same ethos. What a travesty!

UKIP is a libertarian party. It says so in our constitution. Nigel Farage deliberately put that wording in to make it explicitly clear for all time who we are and what we stand for.

I woke up on Monday morning a proud member of libertarian UKIP. I went to bed that night horrified that our party has been hijacked by hardliners. I am a libertarian. I want our party back."


Main photo shows Seamus Martin with Nigel Farage at the Stoke by-election campaigning on behalf of UKIP leader Paul Nuttall.

Part time socailist wrote
at 09:53:25 on 30 April 2017
Changing the subject and a little light relief, will Norman Owen ever get a sear off Labour?
 
Guy Otten wrote
at 08:50:21 on 30 April 2017
I like some of your innovative ideas, which sounds more like Liberal Democrat than UKIP
 
Spok wrote
at 09:58:24 on 29 April 2017
Seamus don't worry no doubt wannabe Felse will step in for UKIP. Tell us Felse ar you running or just a load of hot air.
 
Ajax wrote
at 06:54:54 on 29 April 2017
Gareth L If you didn't like the Burka you would show your dislike by not wearing one. banning clothing is fascist, and in the case of UKIP, racist. Because UKIP have always been known as the BNP in suits. You can not pretend banning Islam is not Anti-Muslim. If you don't like Islam, don't become Muslim. But if you ban others from following their religion, by banning their religious clothing. You are not Anti-Islam, you are anti freedom of religion. Just too cowardly to admit it. And when UKIP made a list of how it intends to limit the practice of Islam, and then said they are not anti-Muslim. It just made them look like a bunch of neo-Nazis too cowardly to admit to being Neo-Nazis. And that is what you are, someone just as Neo-Nazi as the BNP, EDL, NF and BF, but just too cowardly to admit it.
 
Gareth L wrote
at 16:45:28 on 28 April 2017
The trouble with the candidate's views are that they are not libitarianism because he discounts the opposing view without thought couched in inflamatory wording. He is entitled to his opinion and I applaud his principles in stepping down. However tolerance needs debate. I personally do not like birkas i do not like not being able to pick up visual clues, nor do I like the assumption that it is defence because as a male I will oggle all females. I also believe that in an equal society it is not correct. My views are certainly not anti muslim
 
wrote
at 08:56:24 on 28 April 2017
Great news for Salford. If UKIP do not put up it gives a straight fight between Labour and Tory. This will see Tories take Salford and deny Corbyn a shadow cabinet member. Shamus had given the green light for UKIP to zip out all the shadow cabinet by UKIP simply standing down in those Labour constituencies. Goodbye Labour their demise created in Salford. Great tacktics by UKIP.
 
Salford Resident wrote
at 22:29:05 on 27 April 2017
Well said , Seamus, it is good to discover a true “Politician of Conviction”, having “honesty and vision” alive in the C21st. Now the battlelines are drawn for the future, the heart and the raison d’etre of UKIP. The “Blazers” are off - rot usually starts at the bottom, but this time it appears to have started at the top, and extends down to Regional and even local levels. The “Rabid Right” appear to have conducted a coup d’etat against the UKIP Leadership, its NEC and the majority of UKIP members, and their Libertarian views, confirming the public perception of UKIP to what the Media have always believed – erroneously – that UKIP is a “banana bunch” of neo Nazi loonies – in Blazers! To all voters, considering voting UKIP - ask your UKIP candidate where he stands: Are you a crypto-“BNP-er” or a true Libertarian? If the latter, then vote for that candidate; if the former, then abstain from voting. Having read UKIP’s Manifestoes, it has many admirable common-sense policies that would benefit everyone and our Country at all levels. But this disastrous, badly worded and presented “Integration Policy” would appear to be UKIP’s suicide note. If the “Blazers” had their way, where would it end? Seamus has drawn some conclusions – to go further, would Jewish Orthodox clothing and Jewish females wearing Sheitels be banned in public? Likewise the wearing of Crucifixes by Christians or the wearing of a “Dog Collar” in public? Yet UKIP could rise from the ashes of its self-immolation by re-branding, expelling the “Blazers” and stressing its positive policies to which Seamus alluded and appeared in tonight’s Party Political Broadcast by Paul Nuttall. Rest assured, Seamus, that you are not a “lone voice crying in the Wilderness” as my contacts tell me that you are not the only UKIP-approved Parliamentary Candidate in the area who has decided to withdraw for the same religionist reasons and contra-Libertarianism views.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: CLADDING AND WINDOW SAFETY SCARES AT SALFORD BLOCKS
See Pete's comment below...Sorry, we'll get it up asap. With our threadbare resources been pulled all over the place. ... [more]
article: CLADDING AND WINDOW SAFETY SCARES AT SALFORD BLOCKS
Dear Editor, where is the second half of this story? Thanks.The first bit here was a good piece.... [more]
article: HARROP FOLD HEAD SLAMS ‘PERSONAL VENDETTA’ OF SALFORD CITY COUNCIL
When you are suspended you are supposed to keep away from the school and not contact governors, staff or pupils. You are also no... [more]
article: HARROP FOLD HEAD SLAMS ‘PERSONAL VENDETTA’ OF SALFORD CITY COUNCIL
The sad thing in all this is that the kids really liked him, and yes he did do well for the school to start with, but then, as hap... [more]
article: CLADDING AND WINDOW SAFETY SCARES AT SALFORD BLOCKS
More negativitý from Bob the regular - a perfect posìtion to dèflect Tory culpability for the current cladding crisís! Fact,... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

PARENTS MAKE A STAND AGAINST FORCED CHILD REMOVAL BY SALFORD CITY COUNCIL

Star date: 20th September 2018

CIVIC CENTRE SEES PARENTS RAISE AWARENESS OF COUNCIL CHILD REMOVAL PRACTICE

"We're not doing this for the parents we're doing this for the kids, because kids are being hurt..."

Today saw parents who have had their children removed stage an awareness demonstration outside Salford Civic Centre... "We're not fighting for our kids to be brought back to us now, we're fighting for a better system for our kids in the future because it's not right what's going on, it's really not" Katie Jane told the Salford Star.

The demonstration is set to continue tomorrow (Friday) and next week until the 25th September, with networking in Victoria Park over the weekend.

Full details here...

£7MILLION CYCLE AND WALKING ROUTES FOR SALFORD ANNOUNCED

Star date: 20th September 2018

MONTON, SWINTON AND TRINITY WAY TO GET NEW CYCLE PATHS

Transport for Greater Manchester has announced a plan for £7.1million worth of cycle paths and walkways in Monton, Swinton and Trinity Way, with Salford City Council contributing £1.2million towards the total cost.

"The people of Greater Manchester will soon have a genuine choice in how they travel, ensuring that they and their children have a viable and attractive alternative to the car" says Chris Boardman, Greater Manchester Cycling and Walking Commissioner.

Full details here...

HARROP FOLD HEAD SLAMS ‘PERSONAL VENDETTA’ OF SALFORD CITY COUNCIL

Star date: 19th September 2018

DREW POVEY ACCUSES SALFORD COUNCIL OF 'HEAVY HANDED' 'VENDETTA'

"I'm speaking up for myself but also all the leaders who have been in touch to say the same happened to them #TakeAStand..." Drew Povey

Drew Povey, the Executive Head of Harrop Fold in Little Hulton, has resigned from his post, slamming Salford Council's "heavy handed approach" while investigating 'administrative errors' at the school and accusing it of a "personal vendetta".

In an open letter to the school's governors, Drew Povey writes that he refuses to walk away from the school with a settlement and accept a gagging clause.  So he's gone public...to #TakeAStand.

Full details here...

SALFORD BIG HEALTH DAY FOR ADULTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES

Star date: 18th September 2018

BIG HEALTH DAY AT SALFORD CITY FC

Big Health Day
Thursday 20th September 10am-2:45pm free
Salford City FC Moor Lane

This Thursday there's the 9th Annual Big Health Day for adults with learning disabilities, their carers and support staff at Salford City's ground on Moor Lane, with  workshops, activities, information stalls and mystery prizes.  

Full details here...

CLADDING AND WINDOW SAFETY SCARES AT SALFORD BLOCKS

Star date: 18th September 2018

WHY ARE PENDLETON RESIDENTS NOT BEING LISTENED TO?

"The housing provider has lost the good will of residents through their many failings and deafness when it comes to the residents' concerns..."

Windows about to fall out...dodgy cladding...secret safety reports and loads more going on at the Pendleton Together blocks near Salford Precinct.

Here, in the first of a two part feature, Graeme Langton, the suspended but elected chair of Malus Tenants and Residents' Association, writes about multiple problems residents are facing and suggests some solutions for Salford City Council to ponder.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx