HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD CITY COUNCIL FINALLY TO TIGHTEN UP DEVELOPER PLANNING FEE EVASION
 

Star date: 27th October 2016

COCK-EYED COUNCIL POLICY ON DEVELOPER EVASION TO BE CHANGED

After years of Salford Star exposes of developers avoiding and evading their planning obligations, Salford City Council is finally proposing to change its policy, forcing the speculators to provide a minimum of 10% affordable housing, rising to 40% in some areas, for all building schemes of eleven properties or over.

The Council states that this is "in response to changing levels of viability" – ie the reality that developers are making fortunes without giving anything back to the city. Only problem is that the policy change won't come into force until January 2019. Horses, stable doors and bolting come to mind...

Full details here...


Salford Council Area Values
click image to enlarge

Over the last few years, the Salford Star has documented in great detail, not only the loss to the city of an estimated £42million in planning fees, but also the loss of over 1,000 affordable homes that should have been provided by developers as a part of their payback to Salford for throwing up huge blocks of unaffordable apartments and houses*.

Planning fees, or `planning obligations', are payments that developers should be making for things like transport, public realm, open space, education and affordable housing. However, by submitting `viability assessments' showing that their profits won't be big enough if they had to stand by these obligations, developers have managed to avoid and evade them – also thanks, in part, to Salford Council's own re-drawing of `value areas' and obligation scales only a few years ago in its updated Supplementary Planning Document, or SPD.

Graphic tables were drawn up showing how much developers stood to lose - after making over 17% profit of course - if they had to make these payments and provide affordable housing. Salford Council planners obliged by carving the city into areas by `value' – low, mid, high and premium – and tearing up any need for developers to provide affordable housing according to these areas' value.

So, there was no requirement for affordable housing in all high density apartment schemes, except for those in `premium' areas. Neither did developers have to provide any at all in low value areas; and only between 10% and 20% for low density housing schemes in mid, high and premium areas.

Even these guidelines were thwarted by many developers, as they submitted `viability assessments' showing that their profits just wouldn't be high enough if they had to abide. Many of the housing schemes and luxury apartments subsequently sold out before they were even built, despite developers crying that they weren't `viable'.

While some planning panel councillors objected to the lack of fees and affordable housing, applications were invariably passed – and the city lost fortunes in cash and over 1,000 affordable houses which Salford desperately needs. It's been the biggest scandal in the city for years (give or take a Hazel Blears or two and some Salford Reds).

Now, Salford Council is finally admitting that something is horribly wrong. A new draft Local Plan for Salford, which is 250 page document that sets out how the city should develop over the next twenty years has been published, which is set to go out to consultation from November 8th**.

Within the Plan is a section on Planning Obligations which represents a u-turn by the Council on its attitude towards developers...

Whereas previously planning fees were only applicable to developers building 25 or more properties, this is to change to eleven or more properties. Proposals also state that all high density apartment blocks should have to provide 10% affordable housing***

"There is clear evidence that the high density apartment market is very successful in Salford" states the Plan, understating what everyone in the city already knows, adding that "it is anticipated that there will increasingly be the potential to deliver affordable housing as part of such schemes".

Meanwhile, housing schemes in high value areas should provide a 40% proportion of affordable properties and 20% in mid density apartment schemes, the Plan states, while in premium areas and those nicked from the green belt (see here) 40% of housing and 25% of mid density apartments should be turned over to affordable housing. In mid to high value areas, it's 25% of housing and 10% of mid density apartments; and low, mid to low and mid value areas it's 10% affordable housing for everything.

The Council states that this is all "in response to changing levels of viability" ie developers taking the piss out of the city and cleaning up with their profits.

The community shouldn't get too excited, however. There are loopholes all over the place, and the Plan merely states "All developments should contribute to the delivery of affordable housing as far as practicable". However it is a start...

...Except that the Local Plan doesn't come into effect until 2019 – by which time there will be no valuable scrap of land left that isn't developed, or has planning permission, particularly around the Manchester border. The profit jockeys will have well bolted by then...


***The term `affordable' housing is misleading these days, covering social rent, the more expensive `affordable rent' and `intermediate' properties, which are basically houses and flats bought via various help schemes. All the `affordable housing' in high density apartments is intermediate.

** For further details on the full draft Salford Local Plan –  click here

*For Salford Star articles on related issues see...

Salford Star print issue 10 – The Salford Planning Scandal – for electronic version click here and for an update on the £42million scandal - click here

Salford Council Enshrines Huge Developer Profits into Planning Process – click here

Salford Council Gives City To Developers – click here

See also around fifty articles on specific planning applications – use the Archive button or search engine on the Star front page.

For the dire state of Salford's Affordable Housing - see here

Michael James Felse wrote
at 4:13:17 AM on Friday, October 28, 2016
You are correct SalfordLad. If someone has a business or property in Salford they do not have to be living here to be a Councillor. I could stand in Nottingham, Yorkshire, Derbyshire, Cumbria or in five parts of Manchester but I prefer to think of Salford as the best. I do however think any MP should have to live in the area they represent because of big decisions they have to make that rule our futures. Has any MP condemned destroying the Green Belt land of Salford for instance?
 
Salford lad wrote
at 11:09:56 PM on Thursday, October 27, 2016
Manchester is expanding into Salford as there is no cheap available land south of Manchester City. Ultimately Salford which is already a sattelite of Manchester will cease to exist as we know it. Devomax will rein us in and pull the strings. The Councillors have for several years sold their souls, some don't even reside within the Salford boundaries.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Brexit Salford
stephensons ad 1
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD POLIO SUFFERER WAS TRAPPED UPSTAIRS FOR THREE MONTHS AS HOUSING ASSOCIATION WON’T FIT LIFT
When I see all the gold, gems and original art owned by Salford Council then reading the problems forced on local people it to me ... [more]
article: GREATER MANCHESTER PRE-BUDGET RALLY HEARS CALLS TO BRING DOWN TORY GOVERNMENT
I thank the Tory Chsncellor for his budget, but clearly not aimed at reviving the North West to the necessary level of health and ... [more]
article: COURT THROWS OUT SALFORD SCHOOL FINE FOR MUM WHO KEPT SERIOUSLY ILL SON AT HOME
I demand our elected Mayor calls in all our head teachers to an Education Legal Rights Executive meeting to ensure nothing in Salf... [more]
article: COURT THROWS OUT SALFORD SCHOOL FINE FOR MUM WHO KEPT SERIOUSLY ILL SON AT HOME
maybe if she had communicated with the school as well as she has with The Star, she would not have been in such a position... [more]
article: SALFORD POLIO SUFFERER WAS TRAPPED UPSTAIRS FOR THREE MONTHS AS HOUSING ASSOCIATION WON’T FIT LIFT
What used to be the case was this. If special work needed to be done, to enable a disabled person to live in ,or continue to live ... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

HUGE COST OF SHUTTING SALFORD DISABLED CHILDREN’S HOME QUESTIONED BY UNISON

Star date: 24th November 2017

SUGGESTED COST OF £250,000 EACH TO MOVE CHILDREN FROM THE GRANGE

Salford City UNISON has written to the Salford Mayor and councillors about the huge cost of moving children from The Grange to placements outside the borough, which it suggests could be as high as £250,000 per child.

Salford Mayor, Paul Dennett, made the decision to shut the city's only home for disabled children but UNISON reckons it would cost more to close the facility than to keep it open. Meanwhile, solicitors representing one of the young people at the Grange are awaiting a judge's decision for a judicial review into the closure.

Full details here...

SALFORD POLIO SUFFERER WAS TRAPPED UPSTAIRS FOR THREE MONTHS AS HOUSING ASSOCIATION WON’T FIT LIFT

Star date: 23rd November 2017  

DISABLED SALIX HOMES TENANT TOLD TO FIND NEW PROPERTY

Salix Homes tenant, Thomas West, has a worsening polio condition that meant the stairlift at his house in Weaste needed alterations but then kept breaking down, leaving him trapped upstairs for three months at one point.

Thomas has been advised by Salford Council that he needs a vertical lift fitted but Salix Homes state it is against their policy and have asked him to consider moving to 'more suitable accommodation'... "I don't want to move" he says, suspecting financial concerns are being put before his needs.

Full details here...

COURT THROWS OUT SALFORD SCHOOL FINE FOR MUM WHO KEPT SERIOUSLY ILL SON AT HOME

Star date: 22nd November 2017

HIS BROTHER HAD ALREADY DIED OF SAME ILLNESS BUT 'HEARTLESS' SCHOOL FINED MUM FOR UNAUTHORISED ABSENCES

"He wasn't going out enjoying himself; he was actually at home trying to breathe..."

A judge at Manchester and Salford Magistrates' Court has thrown out a fine given by Buile Hill Visual Arts College to mum, Nicola Newns, for 'unauthorised absences' of her son, Jacob, despite him suffering from the same serious illness that tragically took the life of his younger brother, Ben, a few years ago.

Court papers showed that the school complained it took them two hours once to contact Nicola – when she was actually in an ambulance with Jacob on the way to A&E; and then couldn't contact her for four days...when she was sat by his bed in intensive care "Praying he gets better".

Full details here...

GREATER MANCHESTER PRE-BUDGET RALLY HEARS CALLS TO BRING DOWN TORY GOVERNMENT

Star date: 21st November 2017

'ARROGANT AND CRUEL' TORY GOVERNMENT GOT TO GO SAY JULIE HESMONDHALGH, TRADE UNIONISTS AND LABOUR COUNCILLORS

Tonight, a Pre-Budget rally on the steps of GMex in Manchester heard constant calls for the 'arrogant and cruel' Tory Government to be brought down.

Speakers at the Manchester People's Assembly rally included trade unionists, Labour Party councillors, the Canon of Manchester Cathedral, plus a message from Julie Hesmondhalgh condemning the Tories' "Unspeakable acts of injustice...against the most vulnerable in our society".

Full details here...

SALFORD SALIX HOMES DISABLED RESIDENT SUICIDE ATTEMPT AS CRIES FOR HELP IGNORED

Star date: 21st November 2017

'HORRIFIED' PARENTS TELL OF SALIX 'TURNING BACK' ON DISABLED SON 

"We can't understand how anyone can let a company do this to a vulnerable person forcing him to try and take his own life..."

The parents of a disabled man living in a Salix Homes flat off Blackfriars Road have written to the Salford City Mayor, Salford MP and local councillors after their son tried to commit suicide in a motorway car park.

The email states that Salix refused to help deal with anti-social behaviour and disability access issues, and "refused to accept that he is even disabled" despite him receiving full PIP... "The fact that his urgent cries for help have been ignored and his landlords have turned their back on him and instructed solicitors rather than provide the help that he urgently needs is horrifying".

Full details and email here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx