HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL TRANSPARENCY BYPASS ON HUGE ORDSALL HOUSING BLOCKS
 

Star date: 4th June 2018

PLANNING TRANSPARENCY NON-EXISTENT AS COUNCIL CONSIDERS PLANS FOR HUGE ORDSALL BLOCKS

This Thursday, Salford City Council planning panel will consider plans for 296 townhouses and apartments in three blocks up to 23 storeys high in Upper Wharf Street in Ordsall.

Thanks to Council policies, the huge development will bring finance for just three affordable houses, while 'viability' issues means the developer will be escaping around £600,000 in planning payments. But, while other councils are bowing to public pressure over planning transparency, Salford is actually getting worse.

Full details here...


Salford Council Transparency
click image to enlarge

The Salford Star really is sounding like a broken record when it comes to developers not paying planning fees. However, while the city struggles financially, the Star just has to keep pointing out the massive monetary losses as the concrete jungle expands...

...And that is not getting any easier, as Salford City Council, despite its 'great eight' claim to 'transparency', continues to muddy the real figures that developers should be coughing up for their wall-to-wall profit farms known as apartment blocks.

The latest contender for fee avoidance is Outwood Developments 2 Ltd which is applying for planning permission this week to build 296 flats and townhouses (283 flats and 13 townhouses) in three blocks rising from eight to 23 storeys high on Upper Wharf Street in Ordsall, near Oldfield Road.

Because of Salford Council's own planning policies, the developer doesn't have to pay fees for education or affordable houses to put up any of its apartments. It only has to pay for these things on its houses – twenty per cent of 13 houses, which is three affordable houses and £36,645 in education payments, plus £50,365 for 'open space'.

These figures are not provided in the report; the Star has had to work it out from the Council's own tables...

"The development is likely to result in increased demand for access to public realm and public open space within the vicinity of the site, as a result of the increase in residents" states the Council's planning officer's report "Planning obligations have therefore been sought to mitigate against this impact.

"With regard to education and affordable housing contributions, the level of planning obligations required in this case is applied to the 13 townhouse units only. In accordance with the Planning Obligations SPD, education and affordable housing contributions are not applied to the apartments within the scheme."

As far as the apartments go, according to the Council's own tables, the developer should be paying an estimated £1.367million in planning contributions for transport, public realm and open space.

With this fee plus the education and open space payments for the houses, the total is around £1.454million, as estimated by the Star based on official Council tables...but the developer is being asked for just £864,000 with an added 'clawback' agreement that if profits are sky high, some more money might be forthcoming.

"A review of the applicant's viability appraisal undertaken by the City Council's consultant surveyors concluded that the applicant's assertions that the scheme cannot support the full level of contribution sought is sound" the report adds "On this basis the applicant and the City Council have agreed a contribution of £864,000."

Where has that £864,000 figure come from? It appears to have just been plucked out of the air. No figures or breakdowns are provided for any of the payments...nor where these Section 106 payments might be going; only that they "would be directed towards projects that have been agreed in writing with the Chair of Planning Panel" (Councillor Ray Mashiter).

So, let's get this right about the 'transparent' Salford Council...Three massive blocks of 296 apartments and townhouses, with payment for just three affordable properties (not specified) and education payments (not specified), and reduced planning fee of £864,000 (no breakdown), with these payments going to non-specified projects at the discretion of Councillor Mashiter

Back in the day, at least Council planning officers used to lay out the exact fees due, so that Salford council tax payers could actually see how much they were being ripped off. Now, as other councils are beginning to bow to public pressure and publish things like 'viability assessments', Salford City Council is going the other way...while having a great big 'transparency' banner on the Civic Centre...

Will any councillors sat on the planning panel this Thursday question any of this? Of course they won't!

Meanwhile, at the same planning meeting this week, Urban Splash will be applying to increase the number of apartments on its Springfield Lane site from one hundred to 150. As such, the Section 106 payments will increase from £100,000 to £150,000, or just £1,000 per apartment, plus a 'clawback' agreement.


See also previous Salford Star article - Salford Council Banner Declares 'Transparency' Despite Everything Being Secret - click here

Update: 8th June: Salford planning panel councillors told not to question Council planning policy - click here

Alice wrote
at 14:36:09 on 06 June 2018
I am amazed to read that the Council is doing it again...bowing down to Developers with apparent little thought or consideration for the Salford residents trying to get together the deposit to buy a home. .....an actual house, not an apartment, but a house in which they can build a life maybe with children. Apartments are not suitable for children because they rarely have a garden or playing space. They are usually the smallest space possible to maximise the number of units. .....that's what battery hens' buildings are judged on! Increasing the profits is lower down the list than quality of life. I am a Labour supporter but ashamed of these decisions. Why three affordable houses....why not insist on 33 or more and fewer apartments. I know the answer and it's not a social one!
 
Bob the regular wrote
at 15:55:42 on 04 June 2018
They might not be building council flats any more , but this block sure looks like em. It reminds me of the block at the end of cross lane, before the cladding gang got on the job.
 
Gareth L wrote
at 14:14:26 on 04 June 2018
When will Ordsall be rebranded Media City or Quays 2?
 
The Fat End of The Wedge wrote
at 14:12:54 on 04 June 2018
I think Salford Council is fairly transparent - anyone can see they are incompetent.. Seriously though, whenever I travel into Manchester by road, rail or tram, I inevitably pass a new development site for the latest tower block. That being either within Salford, or Manchester city centre area. Some now seem so close to each other that somebody in one block could almost reach over and touch somebody on the balcony in an adjacent building. The view for 25 - 50% of residents will be into the apartment on the same level in the adjacent building. Lovely. My most recent visit was by tram last Thursday afternoon, and despite it being nice and sunny quite often we were in shadow due to the over-development along the route, and darkness appeared to have descended over some areas. Nice to see they have started digging up Pomona, presumably to shove another monstrosity into the air... How I wish I could afford to live in one...
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PARENTS MAKE A STAND AGAINST FORCED CHILD REMOVAL BY SALFORD CITY COUNCIL
I am a little lost here. Surely a court order is needed to remove a child from their parents.and social services would need a goo... [more]
article: CLADDING AND WINDOW SAFETY SCARES AT SALFORD BLOCKS
Ray, they all new of the dangers, as part of the sales pitch used by rockwool and rockpanel, they used to show a building in austr... [more]
article: LOST SALFORD STREETS EXHIBITION
I lived in the green grocers shop on Eccles New Road and played in Zion street behind with friends with the only names I recall be... [more]
article: CLADDING AND WINDOW SAFETY SCARES AT SALFORD BLOCKS
Moved away best move, firstly I take it you don't live in these blocks one thing is for sure and that is your a moron as your unde... [more]
article: HARROP FOLD HEAD SLAMS ‘PERSONAL VENDETTA’ OF SALFORD CITY COUNCIL
Bob the regular thinks there will be a big payout and an apology. No. The authority have gone by the book; if serious allegations... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

PARENTS MAKE A STAND AGAINST FORCED CHILD REMOVAL BY SALFORD CITY COUNCIL

Star date: 20th September 2018

CIVIC CENTRE SEES PARENTS RAISE AWARENESS OF COUNCIL CHILD REMOVAL PRACTICE

"We're not doing this for the parents we're doing this for the kids, because kids are being hurt..."

Today saw parents who have had their children removed stage an awareness demonstration outside Salford Civic Centre... "We're not fighting for our kids to be brought back to us now, we're fighting for a better system for our kids in the future because it's not right what's going on, it's really not" Katie Jane told the Salford Star.

The demonstration is set to continue tomorrow (Friday) and next week until the 25th September, with networking in Victoria Park over the weekend.

Full details here...

£7MILLION CYCLE AND WALKING ROUTES FOR SALFORD ANNOUNCED

Star date: 20th September 2018

MONTON, SWINTON AND TRINITY WAY TO GET NEW CYCLE PATHS

Transport for Greater Manchester has announced a plan for £7.1million worth of cycle paths and walkways in Monton, Swinton and Trinity Way, with Salford City Council contributing £1.2million towards the total cost.

"The people of Greater Manchester will soon have a genuine choice in how they travel, ensuring that they and their children have a viable and attractive alternative to the car" says Chris Boardman, Greater Manchester Cycling and Walking Commissioner.

Full details here...

HARROP FOLD HEAD SLAMS ‘PERSONAL VENDETTA’ OF SALFORD CITY COUNCIL

Star date: 19th September 2018

DREW POVEY ACCUSES SALFORD COUNCIL OF 'HEAVY HANDED' 'VENDETTA'

"I'm speaking up for myself but also all the leaders who have been in touch to say the same happened to them #TakeAStand..." Drew Povey

Drew Povey, the Executive Head of Harrop Fold in Little Hulton, has resigned from his post, slamming Salford Council's "heavy handed approach" while investigating 'administrative errors' at the school and accusing it of a "personal vendetta".

In an open letter to the school's governors, Drew Povey writes that he refuses to walk away from the school with a settlement and accept a gagging clause.  So he's gone public...to #TakeAStand.

Full details here...

SALFORD BIG HEALTH DAY FOR ADULTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES

Star date: 18th September 2018

BIG HEALTH DAY AT SALFORD CITY FC

Big Health Day
Thursday 20th September 10am-2:45pm free
Salford City FC Moor Lane

This Thursday there's the 9th Annual Big Health Day for adults with learning disabilities, their carers and support staff at Salford City's ground on Moor Lane, with  workshops, activities, information stalls and mystery prizes.  

Full details here...

CLADDING AND WINDOW SAFETY SCARES AT SALFORD BLOCKS

Star date: 18th September 2018

WHY ARE PENDLETON RESIDENTS NOT BEING LISTENED TO?

"The housing provider has lost the good will of residents through their many failings and deafness when it comes to the residents' concerns..."

Windows about to fall out...dodgy cladding...secret safety reports and loads more going on at the Pendleton Together blocks near Salford Precinct.

Here, in the first of a two part feature, Graeme Langton, the suspended but elected chair of Malus Tenants and Residents' Association, writes about multiple problems residents are facing and suggests some solutions for Salford City Council to ponder.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx