HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL TRANSPARENCY BYPASS ON HUGE ORDSALL HOUSING BLOCKS
 

Star date: 4th June 2018

PLANNING TRANSPARENCY NON-EXISTENT AS COUNCIL CONSIDERS PLANS FOR HUGE ORDSALL BLOCKS

This Thursday, Salford City Council planning panel will consider plans for 296 townhouses and apartments in three blocks up to 23 storeys high in Upper Wharf Street in Ordsall.

Thanks to Council policies, the huge development will bring finance for just three affordable houses, while 'viability' issues means the developer will be escaping around 600,000 in planning payments. But, while other councils are bowing to public pressure over planning transparency, Salford is actually getting worse.

Full details here...


Salford Council Transparency
click image to enlarge

The Salford Star really is sounding like a broken record when it comes to developers not paying planning fees. However, while the city struggles financially, the Star just has to keep pointing out the massive monetary losses as the concrete jungle expands...

...And that is not getting any easier, as Salford City Council, despite its 'great eight' claim to 'transparency', continues to muddy the real figures that developers should be coughing up for their wall-to-wall profit farms known as apartment blocks.

The latest contender for fee avoidance is Outwood Developments 2 Ltd which is applying for planning permission this week to build 296 flats and townhouses (283 flats and 13 townhouses) in three blocks rising from eight to 23 storeys high on Upper Wharf Street in Ordsall, near Oldfield Road.

Because of Salford Council's own planning policies, the developer doesn't have to pay fees for education or affordable houses to put up any of its apartments. It only has to pay for these things on its houses twenty per cent of 13 houses, which is three affordable houses and 36,645 in education payments, plus 50,365 for 'open space'.

These figures are not provided in the report; the Star has had to work it out from the Council's own tables...

"The development is likely to result in increased demand for access to public realm and public open space within the vicinity of the site, as a result of the increase in residents" states the Council's planning officer's report "Planning obligations have therefore been sought to mitigate against this impact.

"With regard to education and affordable housing contributions, the level of planning obligations required in this case is applied to the 13 townhouse units only. In accordance with the Planning Obligations SPD, education and affordable housing contributions are not applied to the apartments within the scheme."

As far as the apartments go, according to the Council's own tables, the developer should be paying an estimated 1.367million in planning contributions for transport, public realm and open space.

With this fee plus the education and open space payments for the houses, the total is around 1.454million, as estimated by the Star based on official Council tables...but the developer is being asked for just 864,000 with an added 'clawback' agreement that if profits are sky high, some more money might be forthcoming.

"A review of the applicant's viability appraisal undertaken by the City Council's consultant surveyors concluded that the applicant's assertions that the scheme cannot support the full level of contribution sought is sound" the report adds "On this basis the applicant and the City Council have agreed a contribution of 864,000."

Where has that 864,000 figure come from? It appears to have just been plucked out of the air. No figures or breakdowns are provided for any of the payments...nor where these Section 106 payments might be going; only that they "would be directed towards projects that have been agreed in writing with the Chair of Planning Panel" (Councillor Ray Mashiter).

So, let's get this right about the 'transparent' Salford Council...Three massive blocks of 296 apartments and townhouses, with payment for just three affordable properties (not specified) and education payments (not specified), and reduced planning fee of 864,000 (no breakdown), with these payments going to non-specified projects at the discretion of Councillor Mashiter

Back in the day, at least Council planning officers used to lay out the exact fees due, so that Salford council tax payers could actually see how much they were being ripped off. Now, as other councils are beginning to bow to public pressure and publish things like 'viability assessments', Salford City Council is going the other way...while having a great big 'transparency' banner on the Civic Centre...

Will any councillors sat on the planning panel this Thursday question any of this? Of course they won't!

Meanwhile, at the same planning meeting this week, Urban Splash will be applying to increase the number of apartments on its Springfield Lane site from one hundred to 150. As such, the Section 106 payments will increase from 100,000 to 150,000, or just 1,000 per apartment, plus a 'clawback' agreement.


See also previous Salford Star article - Salford Council Banner Declares 'Transparency' Despite Everything Being Secret - click here

Update: 8th June: Salford planning panel councillors told not to question Council planning policy - click here

Alice wrote
at 14:36:09 on 06 June 2018
I am amazed to read that the Council is doing it again...bowing down to Developers with apparent little thought or consideration for the Salford residents trying to get together the deposit to buy a home. .....an actual house, not an apartment, but a house in which they can build a life maybe with children. Apartments are not suitable for children because they rarely have a garden or playing space. They are usually the smallest space possible to maximise the number of units. .....that's what battery hens' buildings are judged on! Increasing the profits is lower down the list than quality of life. I am a Labour supporter but ashamed of these decisions. Why three affordable houses....why not insist on 33 or more and fewer apartments. I know the answer and it's not a social one!

Bob the regular wrote
at 15:55:42 on 04 June 2018
They might not be building council flats any more , but this block sure looks like em. It reminds me of the block at the end of cross lane, before the cladding gang got on the job.

Gareth L wrote
at 14:14:26 on 04 June 2018
When will Ordsall be rebranded Media City or Quays 2?

The Fat End of The Wedge wrote
at 14:12:54 on 04 June 2018
I think Salford Council is fairly transparent - anyone can see they are incompetent.. Seriously though, whenever I travel into Manchester by road, rail or tram, I inevitably pass a new development site for the latest tower block. That being either within Salford, or Manchester city centre area. Some now seem so close to each other that somebody in one block could almost reach over and touch somebody on the balcony in an adjacent building. The view for 25 - 50% of residents will be into the apartment on the same level in the adjacent building. Lovely. My most recent visit was by tram last Thursday afternoon, and despite it being nice and sunny quite often we were in shadow due to the over-development along the route, and darkness appeared to have descended over some areas. Nice to see they have started digging up Pomona, presumably to shove another monstrosity into the air... How I wish I could afford to live in one...

Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Giraffe
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: 5MILLION RESTORATION PROJECT LAUNCHED FOR SALFORD CHURCH OF ASCENSION
Fantastic news. A beautiful building being brought back from the ashes. A building of great historical interest. Hope the same ca... [more]
article: 5MILLION RESTORATION PROJECT LAUNCHED FOR SALFORD CHURCH OF ASCENSION
About time they coughed up the cash considering the church company doesn't pay tax...assuming it is the church paying. Hope it is.... [more]
article: BUILE HILL PARK HOUSING IS ONLY WAY TO SAVE SALFORD MANSION STATES DEVELOPER
I never suggested the costings had been workd out on the back of a beer mat if they had ,they would be a lot less than 4million. ... [more]
article: BUILE HILL PARK HOUSING IS ONLY WAY TO SAVE SALFORD MANSION STATES DEVELOPER
Ray I have not missed any point. if you look at my suggestions for use of the depot land, you will find I liked the idea by Mr Bre... [more]
article: BUILE HILL PARK HOUSING IS ONLY WAY TO SAVE SALFORD MANSION STATES DEVELOPER
Cody is right when he points out the 400 million cost of the Shard. It is 100 times the floor area of the mansion, so the actual ... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

COMMUNITY CAROLS AT SALFORD SHOPPING CENTRE

Star date: 15th December 2018

CHARITY CAROLS FROM THREE CHOIRS

Carols at Salford Shopping Centre
Tuesday 18th- Thursday 20th December

Three choirs will be performing Christmas carols at Salford Shopping Centre this week, as Saint Phillips Chapel Street, Larkhill Community Primary School and Pendleton Community Choir rock the Precinct with yuletide wonder.

Full details here...

SALFORD RESIDENTS LAUNCH NEW SANTA PROTEST IN RESPONSE TO BELLWAY HOMES LEGAL THREATS TO STOP PROTESTS

Star date: 14th December 2018

AS BELLWAY THREATENS INJUNCTIONS AND FINES, SWINTON RESIDENTS RESPOND WITH SANTA PROTEST

"Saturday is the day for reminding Bellway that we have every right to peaceful assembly on a public footpath..."

Two weeks ago, Bellway Homes' solicitors wrote to the Saving Our Neighbourhood campaign - which is objecting to the company's mad construction of 241 houses off Campbell Road in Swinton - threatening injunctions and fines unless it wrote an 'undertaking' not to "interfere and/or attempt to interfere with Bellway's legitimate commercial interests".

In response, tomorrow at noon, residents will hold a special Santa protest at the site entrance..."It's vital that our community makes it clear that a threat from a multi-billion pound developer...will not scare us into signing away our democratic legal rights" states the group.

Full details here...

5MILLION RESTORATION PROJECT LAUNCHED FOR SALFORD CHURCH OF ASCENSION

Star date: 13th December 2018

GRADE 2 LISTED LOWER BROUGHTON CHURCH SEES TWO YEAR RESTORATION

A 5million two year restoration project was launched today for the Grade 2 listed Church of the Ascension which was badly damaged in a huge blaze back in February last year.

"It's the only old building left in Lower Broughton, so we think it's very important that we don't take people's memories away" Canon David Wyatt told the Salford Star a month after the fire. Now the church is set to rise from ashes.

Full details here...

THE MOODS PLAY MUSIC FROM THE NORTH AT BAND ON THE WALL

Star date: 12th December 2018

DON'T MISS THE MOODS AND CO THIS SATURDAY!

Music from the North
The Moods, Pleasures, Glove, Falling Ghosts and DJ Stephen Doyle
Saturday 15th December from 7pm
Band On The Wall 10

This Saturday, there's another brilliant Music from the North gig at Band On The Wall hosted by A1M Records, with Salford Star Best Band Award winners, The Moods and a full line-up of upcoming talent. Ian Leslie catches up with Paul Travis of A1M Records to get the gen.

Full details here...

SALFORD PANTO ON THE PARK IN LOWER BROUGHTON

Star date: 11th December 2018

SALFORD CINDERELLA PLUS DANCE TROUPES AND STALLS

Panto On The Park
Sunday 16th December 12noon-3pm
Green Grosvenor Park, Lower Broughton (suggested donation 1-2)

This Sunday, 16th December, Up Ere Theatre Group will be performing their own version of Salford's Cinderella in a heated marquee at Green Grosvenor Park in Lower Broughton. There'll also be performances from dance troupes Salford Aces, Urban Angels and JD Dance, plus lots of stalls, face painting and more.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx