HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
AS MANCHESTER GETS NO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FROM DEVELOPERS, SHELTER URGES END TO PLANNING EVASION
 

Star date: 3rd November 2017

EVEN GOVERNMENT HOUSING MINISTER NOW SAYS 'VIABILITY' SYSTEM 'NOT WORKING'

Research by housing charity Shelter has shown that where 'viability assessment' has been used by developers in planning, 79% of affordable homes have been lost. Shelter looked at planning applications for eleven councils, including Manchester where no affordable houses were provided as developers used the get-out.

Separate research by the Salford Star has shown over 1,000 affordable houses in the city have been lost over the last few years through viability assessments. This week, even the Tory Housing Minister said the system is "not working", while Shelter urged the Government to "fix our broken housing system" and close the loophole.

Full details here...


Affordable Housing Scandal
click image to enlarge

The issue of affordable housing evasion has permeated the Salford Star over the last decade like a broken record. Virtually every single planning application that comes before Salford City Council has developers getting out their violins and handkerchiefs pleading that if they had to pay Section 106 contributions and provide affordable housing their profits just won't be big enough. And the Council usually rolls over helping them to wipe their tears away.

Nationally, councils argue that their hands are tied, due to the Government's National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) which states that developers have a right to 'competitive returns' - interpreted as up to 20% profit margins - otherwise their schemes will not be 'viable'...and developers produce 'viability assessments', usually created by specialist planning companies such as Gary Neville's Zerum*, to 'prove' their case.

In Salford, the Council refuses to make these 'viability assessments' public, so there is no way the public or press can check whether developers are bulling or not; even though, last month, Portsmouth was the latest council to force developers to go public with their 'viability assessments' (see previous Salford Star article – click here)

In September, the Salford Star showed how developers responsible for 4,172 flats and houses in Greengate and Chapel Street, including Middlewood Locks and Vimto Gardens, had produced finance for just two affordable houses, using both the viability get-out and Salford Council's own developer-friendly policies (see here).

Meanwhile, in the Salford Star print issue two years ago, we listed every single housing scheme in the city over a twelve month period in which planning contributions and affordable housing had been lost through 'viability assessments'. It totalled £19,275,553 in fees and 830 affordable houses (see the electronic version click here). Since then, further research has shown those figures mushrooming to over 1,000 affordable houses lost and over £42million in planning fees avoided by developers (see here).

Now, the 'viability assessment' loophole is being questioned on a national level. This week, housing charity Shelter released research based on Freedom of Information responses from eleven councils over a twelve month period showing that, where 'viability assessments' had been used, 2,525 affordable homes, or 79%, were lost from the number required by council policies.

"Viability assessments allow developers to reduce the number of affordable houses they build on their site, if they can show building them risks reducing their profits to below 20%" Shelter stated "It means many developers face no penalty for over-paying for land because they can recover the costs by reducing their commitments to building new affordable homes."

Shelter looked at planning applications in Birmingham, Brent, Bristol, Cambridge, Leeds, Leicester, Manchester, Newcastle, Oxford, Kensington and Chelsea, and Southwark during 2015-16.

In Manchester, out of 2,362 flats and houses that had planning applied for, there was not one single affordable property provided by developers where the viability get-out had been used. With Manchester City Council having a 20% target for affordable housing in applications, Shelter calculated that 472 affordable properties were lost.

This compared to a provision of 11% affordable housing provided where no viability assessment was used, although there was still a shortfall of 178 affordable properties (out of 1,911 applied for).

Other local authorities where no affordable housing was provided, via 'viability assessments', included Leicester, Newcastle and Kensington and Chelsea (home to Grenfell Tower).

Birmingham managed to squeeze 1% of affordable housing from developers' wallets (a loss of over 1,000 affordable properties), and Leeds and Bristol managed 8%. Southwark Council managed 26% and Brent 25% affordable housing – which shows the differing attitudes and enforcement nationally.

This week, addressing a Communities and Local Government Select Committee, even Tory Housing Minister, Alok Sharma, said the viability assessment system was "not working"...although he refused to scrap it.

"If it is much clearer in local plans what the infrastructure requirements will be then potential buyers of land will behave rationally and factor that requirement in to any price they pay" he said "Our view would be that abolishing [viability assessments] altogether is not the approach; making sure we look at this much earlier in the process is probably going to be the right approach."

Meanwhile, Shelter has urged the Government to fix the system and close the 'viability' loophole after the charity unleashed its research...

"What this research reveals is the scale at which developers are able to use legal loopholes to protect their profits and dramatically reduce the numbers of affordable homes available for people" said Shelter chief executive, Polly Neate.

"Through freedom of information powers, Shelter has been able to reveal the extent to which affordable homes are required in local plans, only to be dropped by developers" she added "The Government needs to fix our broken housing system – and it must start by closing this loophole to get the country building homes that are genuinely affordable for people on middle and low incomes to rent or buy."

Responding to pressure locally, Salford Council has stated that it will change its own pathetic policies that allow developers to avoid provision of affordable housing in certain areas of the city in 2019 (see here) – by which time there won't be a scrap of valuable land left in the city that hasn't already got planning permission.


* Gary Neville is a director of Zerum Construction Management Ltd, which has helped planning fee avoiders like Middlewood Locks (£6million avoided), Peel Holdings (£millions avoided) and Pegasus M6/Vermont Construction on Frederick Road (£400,000 avoided) – see previous article click here.

For full details of every single planning application in Salford that has used 'viability assessments' to avoid planning fees and affordable housing provision just put 'viability' into the Salford Star search engine at the top of our website front page.

Sign the 38Degrees petition to 'Make housing developers be transparent in Salford' - click here

See also previous Salford Star articles...

Salford Council Gives Ordsall Away For Nothing - click here

Salford becomes 2nd Home Capital of England - click here

Fred Done £22million Backed Subsidised Flats Marketed to Hong Kong Investors - click here

End of Salford wrote
at 5:53:34 AM on Saturday, November 4, 2017
Wrote paints an end to Salford. The quays land is fast running out. Where will property developers go next. Chimney Pot Park for eight private 28 story apartments blocks to bring 600 modern professionals into Salford paying council tax and Ordsal Park the same maybe the Socialist Labour answer. Are any open spaces safe as Labour have to find cash to pay for the cladding mistake.
 
wrote
at 1:15:29 PM on Friday, November 3, 2017
As the plague that began in Salford quays spreads to other parts of Salford the developers will continue to not pay fees and the real Salfordians will be forced out to make way for the brave new world. If you live in these developments, you are part of the problem that is screwing over Salford and Salfordians.
 
Mary ferrer wrote
at 1:15:05 PM on Friday, November 3, 2017
Where would we be without Steve and the Salford Star.WE would be total mushrooms.sitting in the dark with the sh-t falling on us from a great height. Thank you Salford Star. We need to get you back in print.
 
Paul Gerrard wrote
at 8:05:06 AM on Friday, November 3, 2017
Salford Star have an honourable record for raising this issue which Shelter, sadly, and the rest of the media have only just noticed. Scheme after scheme has been analysed on your site and found wanting. Salford has a reputation for being a soft touch as blocks in Chapel Street / Greengate etc, a mere stone's throw away from Harvey Nicks, are described as 'unviable' (you what??) if social housing is included. Pull the other one. We await comment from Salford City Council.
 
Alice wrote
at 8:05:02 AM on Friday, November 3, 2017
It goes on and on! No wonder the residents of Salford find it hard to believe that our Labour Council can turn its back on the principles that Labour is supposed to stand for. It seemed that some Councils have found the guts to insist on the legitimate rights to planning fees and the moral rights to homes that can be afforded. Respect would be earned if our Council found the same strength to say No to these greedy developers. I predict that these luxury flats will be rejected eventually. There use is short term. People want and need houses in the long term, where a family can build a life, not just 'a pad' to support a job. .
 
Michael James Felse wrote
at 8:04:24 AM on Friday, November 3, 2017
Salford Council is run by Labour. We must demand answers from them about all the things the people elected them to do. It's well done again to Salford Star for keeping us in the know.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Shopping Centre
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PETER HOOK AND THE LIGHT TO DO NEW ORDER ALBUMS IN MANCHESTER
Nice one Hooky ... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL TO BORROW £38MILLION FOR OFFICE BLOCK
Phil all we no about you is your in love with the Mayor, credible alternative! well Phil at least we have the balls to put our hat... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL TO BORROW £38MILLION FOR OFFICE BLOCK
Felse, Ferrer, Oneil ... Be quiet. None of you are credible as an alternative to Labour. None of you has a genuine pedigree. Oneil... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL TO BORROW £38MILLION FOR OFFICE BLOCK
Salford's Labour controlled Council are sounding more like the Tories, protecting the wealthy and forgetting about the poor. 10 ... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL TO BORROW £38MILLION FOR OFFICE BLOCK
John will be thinking did our Labour Mayor know we are about to give £10million to an area 26 miles away as he delivered his said ... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD COUNCIL U-TURN ON NURSERY CLOSURE CONSULTATION

Star date: 22nd February 2018 

HUMILIATING CLIMBDOWN FOR SALFORD CITY MAYOR

Just two days after announcing that a consultation would begin on 26th February for closing Salford's five nurseries, this afternoon Salford Council announced that it is to be paused for a month.

Less than a week ago a huge Save Our Nurseries public meeting voted, against the wishes of Salford City Mayor, Paul Dennett, and Children's Lead Member, Lisa Stone, for the closure consultation to be stopped. In the face of growing anger from the community the Council has been forced into a humiliating climb down.

Full details here...

SALFORD UNIVERSITY LECTURERS STRIKE OVER POSSIBLE 40% PENSION CUT

Star date: 22nd February 2018

'THIS IS THE LAST STRAW'

Salford University lecturers went on strike today over an attack on their pensions, which their union, UCU, states could lead to a cut of between 20% and 40%.

Pickets were mounted at all entrances of the University, where UCU official Matt Arrowsmith told the Salford Star, "Our members feel this is the last straw...Nobody wants to be on strike but this is our last line of defence."

Full details here...

SALFORD COUNCIL TO BORROW £38MILLION FOR OFFICE BLOCK

Star date: 21st February 2018

COUNCIL TO BORROW £38.6MILLION FOR EMBANKMENT OFFICES

Cash strapped Salford City Council, currently mired in controversy over shutting its five nurseries, is to borrow £38.6million this year to 'invest' in its new 100 Embankment office block.

It's part of an overall £200million 'investment' in this block and its Two New Bailey block.

Full details here...

SALFORD COUNCIL NURSERY CLOSURE GOVERNMENT BOMBSHELL

Star date: 20th February 2018

GOVERNMENT REVEALS THAT SALFORD COUNCIL NEVER ASKED FOR FUNDING FLEXIBILITY

Salford City Council recently announced that it was proposing to close all five of its nurseries. And yesterday Children's Lead Member, Lisa Stone, said that it was "a direct result of Government changes, which reduce the use of Dedicated Schools Grant."

However, this afternoon a spokesperson for the Department for Education told the Salford Star that "Any council that had concerns…could apply to the department for increased flexibility" in the Grant's use. They added that "The Department has not received a request from Salford for increased flexibility…" This is bound to increase pressure on the City Mayor to hold off the consultation on the closures.

Full details here…

SALFORD RED DEVILS AUDITOR ‘CASTS DOUBT’ ABOUT ‘COMPANY’S ABILITY TO CONTINUE’

Star date: 19th February 2018

SALFORD REDS ACCOUNTS SHOW ALMOST £9MILLION LIABILITIES

New accounts published for the Salford Red Devils show that the company made losses of over £700,000 last year and that it has net liabilities of almost £9million, including the £1million loan from Salford City Council.

Despite the directors insisting that restructures and changes within the club forecast a 'modest profit', its auditor states that the conditions "indicate the existence of a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern".

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx