HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD PROPERTY DEVELOPERS TO AVOID ANOTHER £1MILLION PLANNING FEES
 

Star date: 13th June 2017

ALMOST NO FEES FOR OVER 250 APARTMENTS AT SALFORD SKILLS CENTRE AND IRWELL HOUSE

Fees of over £1million are set to be avoided when Salford City Council planning panel meets this week to consider applications for over 250 apartments on the sites of the former Salford Skills Centre on Liverpool Street and Irwell House on Frederick Road.

The schemes, by X1 Developments and Vermont Property Developers, are to avoid payments on 'viability' grounds because profit levels won't be high enough...

Full details here...


X1 Development on site of Salford Skills Centre
click image to enlarge

This Thursday, Salford Council's planning panel looks set to approve two applications for over 250 apartments and townhouses that will see developers avoid over £1million in planning fees.

First up is a proposal by X1 Developments for 178 apartments and 13 townhouses, in five, ten and 14 storey blocks, on the site of the Salford Skills Centre at the corner of Liverpool Street and Oldfield Road.

According to Salford Council's own tables of planning fees, this development in a mid to high value area should be contributing £988,364 in planning fees for open space, public realm and transport, while providing 18 affordable flats and three affordable houses. In the event, the city will get nothing, except through a possible 'clawback' clause...

"The application has been supported by a Viability Report which concludes that the proposed scheme would not be viable should the development be required to provide for financial contributions towards public realm improvements, transport infrastructure, and the provision of public open space" states the Council's planning report.

"Indeed the submitted viability appraisal shows a developers profit to be significantly below the general profit levels normally expected (ranging between 15%-20% of GDV)" it weeps "This report has been independently reviewed on behalf of the Council by a third party. This review confirms the conclusion that should any contributions be required it would render the scheme unviable.

"In this instance it is noted that the independent review of development viability considers that the proposed scheme could not viably provide for the above planning
obligations" it adds "therefore it is not considered reasonable in this instance to require these to be secured by way of section 106 agreement."

The report concludes that a 'clawback mechanism' should be provided so that if "market values change... and it becomes viable to provide for planning contributions the necessary contributions are secured" – without actually giving a figure of what the 'necessary contributions' actually are.

So far, the Salford Star has only come across one development amongst dozens where any money at all has been 'clawed back' from developers.

Next up with the violins and hankies are Vermont Property Developments and Bernard and Deborah Lynch, who are proposing 76 units of student accommodation at Irwell House, on the site of the Marpol Security offices on Frederick Road.

Here, the developers have offered a Section 106 payment of just £34,960, to go towards Peel Park, with a further £129,000 subject to yet another 'clawback' agreement. According to the Salford Star estimate of planning fees, based on Salford Council's own figures, they should actually be paying £367,102.

"Whilst it may not be an argument that needs to be recorded, there are obviously
numerous examples of schemes throughout the country, and in Salford, where Planning Permission has been granted and there is no, or a significantly reduced rate of planning obligations within a particular scheme where there will be multiple economic or social benefits emanating from the development itself" state the applicants

"There are significant costs associated with the erection of student accommodation and the provision of a basement car park which will have an impact on the economic viability of the development" they sob "We therefore ask that the Council take this into consideration when debating the need for any planning contributions..."

The planning officers have certainly taken it into 'consideration' and rolled over. Now Thursday will see whether councillors on the planning panel will merely tickle their belly, as the city loses another £million or more...


* The main graphic shows the proposed new development on the site of the Salford Skills Centre


Alice wrote
at 5:58:37 AM on Wednesday, June 14, 2017
Here we go again! After all the debates and understanding resulting from the election our Council seems unaffected and continues to bow to the sob stories of the developers. If Vermont Property Developers can find some 106 money why can't X1 Developments? Also, I do not believe these firms would undertake these developments if they thought they would not be viable. Surely the contributions to the Council and the community should be built into their initial assessment. I think the Council are being 'walked over' by these crafty folk. It would get respect if it said "pay up fees or no permission!" Alternatively, "build some affordable accommodation" or no permission.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Manchester Conservative Party Conference Protest Photos
Salford Star contact
Salford Star
Salford Star print
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: DISABLED PEOPLE AGAINST CUTS LAY SIEGE TO CONSERVATIVE PARTY CONFERENCE
I am one of many who have suffered I received SDA for 18 years and this lot give me 0 POINTS on ESA.I have suffered depression sin... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL DOES NOTHING AS PORTSMOUTH COUNCIL FORCES TRANSPARENCY ON DEVELOPERS
Even with a 'claw back' clause what is there to stop a developer selling off the development half way through construction to anot... [more]
article: GREATER MANCHESTER LAW CENTRE BOYCOTTS UNIVERSAL CREDIT
I encounter people every day who are going through stress and deprivation owing to the policies and their inhumane implementation ... [more]
article: SALFORD PHOTO ARCHIVE GIVEAWAY
Hi All, Great Site, does anyone remember Johnny fielder, he went to St peters school with me in the 60s, it would be great to hear... [more]
article: CONTROVERSIAL SALFORD CHARITY TO BRING IN INDEPENDENT MEDIATOR
How very disturbing this story really is, I’m from Bury and came across this article researching regeneration in Salford, I’m in ... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD COUNCIL DOES NOTHING AS PORTSMOUTH COUNCIL FORCES TRANSPARENCY ON DEVELOPERS

Star date: 19th October 2017

PORTSMOUTH CITY COUNCIL FORCES DEVELOPERS TO REVEAL VIABILITY ASSESSMENTS

As developers in Salford continue to evade £millions in planning obligations and provision of affordable housing, Portsmouth City Council has passed a motion forcing builders to publicly reveal the viability assessments that give them a get-out.

The Salford Star has shown that over £40million has been avoided in the city by developers, plus the loss of over 1,000 affordable houses... "We want to stop developers that are out to deceive people" said Portsmouth Councillor Steve Pitt, as Salford City Council does nothing.

Full details here...

SALFORD RED DEVILS MOVE FORWARD WITH NEW BADGE AND SUPPORTERS’ TRUST

Star date: 18th October 2017

SALFORD FANS GET VOICE WITH INDEPENDENT SALFORD RLFC SUPPORTERS' TRUST

Salford Red Devils have unveiled a new club crest featuring a plethora of symbols, from the willow tree, to a devil's trident to the Lowry Millennium Footbridge.

Meanwhile, the independent Salford RLFC Supporters' Trust has been created to give fans a voice and boost development of the game and team in the city. It's already got almost three hundred members after just two weeks.

Full details here...

MANCHESTER COUNCIL SLATED OVER £10,000 ONE-WAY TICKETS ‘TO GET RID OF HOMELESS’

Star date: 18th October 2017

LIBDEM COUNCILLOR CONDEMNS 'COUNTRY'S MOST RIGHT WING LABOUR COUNCIL' OVER TRAIN TICKETS TO 'GET RID OF HOMELESS'

Manchester City Council has been slated by its only opposition councillor, after it was revealed by the BBC that £10,000 had been spent on one-way train tickets to 'get rid' of the homeless.

"Manchester Council has spent years refusing to build affordable homes, approving luxury developments, evicting and trying to sue the homeless, ignoring the rough sleepers problem and now buying them out of the city" says LibDem councillor, John Leech, "The country's most right-wing Labour council has reached a whole new low."

Full details here...

THE DEATH OF SOCIAL RENT PROPERTIES IN SALFORD?

Star date: 17th October 2017

CITY WEST ACCOUNTS SHOW MOVE AWAY FROM SOCIAL RENT

New accounts for City West Housing Trust show a loss of 259 social rent properties last year, and an increase of 154 more expensive 'affordable rent' properties. Meanwhile, none of the housing company's new units are for social rent, while 98 high rise flats have been converted from social to private rent.

Not-for-profit City West made a surplus of £16.3million last year, while its highest paid director trousered £160,000.

Full details here...

ZOMBIES INVADE ECCLES FOR SALFORD CREDIT UNION AWARENESS WEEK

Star date: 16th October 2017

ZOMBIES GIVE OUT THE MESSAGE: 'DON'T GET SPOOKED BY RIP OFF LENDERS'

A zombie flashmob invaded Church Street in Eccles at the weekend to give out the message: 'Don't get spooked by rip off lenders - get local'.

The event was to kick off Greater Manchester Credit Union Awareness Week and to point people towards using the not-for-profit Salford Credit Union, rather than payday and doorstep lenders, and expensive credit cards.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx